this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
278 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59979 readers
3659 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

im torn. as someone with a massive personal library, bluray was a non-starter. they never fleshed it out to the storage densities i would have required for my library. solid state storage has come so far now, it just makes sense.

someday i'll just be able to hand a single drive with my 100tb of content to my kids. if youre concerned about 'owning' shit. start powning it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] cm0002 8 points 6 days ago

3-2-1 backup rule

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

meh. i have triple redundancy including an offline set. cheap storage means cheap redundancy,

[–] pHr34kY 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

It's $100 for 4TB right now.

But once you factor in RAID and alternating offsite backups, it's really $400 for 4TB.

I go through all the older stuff I pulled from the internet. A lot of it can't be found now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Eh, you can do off-site backups a bit cheaper than that, just bring a drive in to work and leave it in your desk. Boom, off-site backups for the cost of a drive. No need to alternate anything, just bring the drive home every few months to re-sync. Or keep that drive at a relative's/friend's house if work doesn't work for whatever reason.

I'm currently using a RAID mirror only, but I'm planning on doing the "bring your drive to work day" thing, and I think it can work really well. The drive should last something like 5 years (or more!), especially if you're only spinning it up a few times/year.

[–] pHr34kY 2 points 5 days ago

This is the best way. My locker at work has my offsite backup on an encrypted+compressed portable drive. I have two drives that alternate offsite so they are never all in the one spot.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There's currently little reason to choose SSDs over HDDs when you're talking about bulk storage for media. HDDs have plenty of R/W speed for this purpose and are a fraction of the price. New, you can buy 8TB drives for around $100 or used/refurbished (from somewhere like serverpartdeals.com) you can buy 14TB for $150 or even 20TB+ for $250.

[–] pHr34kY 1 points 6 days ago

My raid has an nvme bcache on it, so it's still fairly quick.

$100USD is just what it costs in Australia, because we get screwed for price over here.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

yep, dirt cheap. all about perspective. my first hd was 40mb and cost 250$

e. oh, and you can get solid used 4tbs in bulk for ~60$ now

[–] pHr34kY 2 points 6 days ago

Haha remember when CD burners came out and a $5 CD-R had the capacity of a $200 HDD?

The kid with access to a CD burner was the king of the playground.