this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
609 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59882 readers
4657 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, normally I would say fuck the government, but in this case it's exactly the same as the people who got pissy about Juul getting in trouble for targeting children. I'm all for "freedom to choose", as long as whatever it is you're choosing isn't directly targeting kids with something that has an actively detrimental effect on their health, and that's being tracked as an emergent medical problem by psychiatrists around the world.

[–] Fedizen 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

the law doesn't protect kids tho, everybody who supports this law has to rant about how bad social media is but at the end of the day the law is only about foreign companies. It just says instagram has the right to do all the same shit as tiktok and the only problem the gov has with tiktok is its not US owned.

News Flash: If you gotta lie about what the law is for to justify it, you're part of the misinformation problem.

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 3 days ago

It's a step in the right direction and it can certainly inspire future laws.

People want to get everything all at once when that rarely happens, especially with governments. So much impatience in this world.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 days ago

I didn’t lie, I specifically stated they weren’t doing it for altruistic reasons. But the why isn’t what’s important to me. If them being shitty is a net positive, then I don’t really give a shit.