this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
218 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19236 readers
3193 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Tucker Carlson’s recent interview with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in Moscow has sparked speculation from Kremlin insiders that Carlson may be serving as a secret back-channel between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump.

Carlson’s questioning aligned with Kremlin narratives, urging the U.S. to withdraw support for Ukraine to avoid nuclear conflict.

Russian state media figures suggested Carlson’s visit could involve delivering messages about potential negotiations between Putin and Trump.

Carlson’s interview was criticized for failing to challenge Lavrov’s denials of war crimes and misrepresentations of Russia’s role in the Ukraine conflict.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Yawweee877h444 22 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

So just curious, if there's actual treason occurring by our officially elected president with a foreign adversary, who fixes this? The military? Or what? Seriously curious.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago

We literally saw this during the Jan 6 insurrection.

Nobody fixes it and the military just wait for orders from the winner.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Before the inauguration, I'm pretty sure it's basically on Biden via some sort of official act (I could be wrong about this, I am not a constitutional scholar). After the inauguration, it's on Congress and boy do I have bad news for ya there.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 13 points 2 weeks ago

Can't help noticing the DOGE wants to defund the FBI

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

It's supposed to be Congress via impeachment. Then the DOJ with prosecution.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Well but who decides that they’re our adversary, if not things like the president and the state department and other elements of the executive? Congress could put up a stink, but they certainly haven’t yet and they’re even more tilted in trumps favor right now. The president also commands the military, so Trump could literally just say, we’re friends with Russia now and we are turning our back on NATO and Ukraine and that would now be the paradigm. Kinda fucks my brain over but honestly who’s a friend and who’s an enemy is something very fluid and can simply change…

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

😅 Fixes this?! They've got four more detectives working on the case! They've got us working in shifts!