this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
633 points (95.4% liked)

Science Memes

11670 readers
2328 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
633
YEET (mander.xyz)
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
128 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 106 points 1 month ago (4 children)

There is one detail wrong in the first post; that is not the lids speed but rather it's minimum speed.

[–] Reddfugee42 73 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Notice, children, how the common apostrophe from lid's migrated all the way to its.

Isn't nature amazing?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What makes it more amazing is I understood without even noticing the mistake.

[–] Reddfugee42 2 points 1 month ago

Curious, that doesn't seem amazing at all. But to each their own!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago

Unfortunately they got almost everything else wrong though. Mainly - the cover actually almost certainly just vaporiserd.

[–] victorz 1 points 1 month ago

That's assuming it crossed the image straight from edge to edge, though.

[–] buddascrayon -3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The cover obtained all of its energy from the blast, it can only go slower than its initial speed unless acted upon by another force.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago

No no, because they only had one frame of it moving, they can only calculate and upper and lower bound on it's speed. The number given was the lower bound is what theyre saying.