Technology

59772 readers

4324 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

100

In the space of 1 week, a second open-source Chinese AI model equals the best investors are pouring tens of billions of dollars into. (lemm.ee)

submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/technology

54 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://futurology.today/post/2910566

Alibaba's Qwen team just released QwQ-32B-Preview, a powerful new open-source AI reasoning model that can reason step-by-step through challenging problems and directly competes with OpenAI's o1 series across benchmarks.

The details:

QwQ features a 32K context window, outperforming o1-mini and competing with o1-preview on key math and reasoning benchmarks.

The model was tested across several of the most challenging math and programming benchmarks, showing major advances in deep reasoning.

QwQ demonstrates ‘deep introspection,’ talking through problems step-by-step and questioning and examining its own answers to reason to a solution.

The Qwen team noted several issues in the Preview model, including getting stuck in reasoning loops, struggling with common sense, and language mixing.

Why it matters: Between QwQ and DeepSeek, open-source reasoning models are here — and Chinese firms are absolutely cooking with new models that nearly match the current top closed leaders. Has OpenAI’s moat dried up, or does the AI leader have something special up its sleeve before the end of the year?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] [email protected] -75 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Incidentally, no Western ai would make a statement on Donald Trump's crimes leading up to the election. Ai propaganda is a serious issue. In China the government enforces it, in America, billionaires.

[–] Warl0k3 73 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

One second googling chatgpt disproves this, what the fuck is wrong with you, why are you making up such easily disproved BS?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 days ago

Spreading propaganda for an authoritarian government is a serious issue.

[–] Diplomjodler3 17 points 3 days ago

Doing his job at the troll farm.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

ChatGPT is happy to talk about it.

[+] [email protected] -24 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Perhaps now it is, but leading up to the election, I found gpt would outright refuse to discuss Trump in voice mode. Meta ai too. It was very frustrating. It would start, and then respond with something like, "I'm not able to talk about that, yet."

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Gpt in general doesn't seem to prefer bringing up current events, because it's training dataset runs many months if not years behind. That's not a conspiracy.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

https://openai.com/index/how-openai-is-approaching-2024-worldwide-elections/

Here is a direct quote from openai:

"In addition to our efforts to direct people to reliable sources of information, we also worked to ensure ChatGPT did not express political preferences or recommend candidates even when asked explicitly."

It's not a conspiracy. It was explicitly thier policy not to have the ai discuss these subjects in meaningful detail leading up to the election, even when the facts were not up for debate. Everyone using gpt during that period of time was unlikely to receive meaningful information on anything Trump related, such as the legitimacy of Biden's election. I know because I tried.

This is ostentatiously there to protect voters from fake news. I'm sure it does in some cases, but I'm sure China would say the same thing.

I'm not pro China, I'm suggesting that every country engages in these shenanigans.

Edit it is obvious that a 100 billion dollar company like openai with it's multude of partnerships with news companies could have made gpt communicate accurate and genuinely critical news regarding Trump, but that would be bad for business.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Show your chat logs. I call bullshit.