this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2024
224 points (97.9% liked)

World News

39329 readers
1713 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The newly restored 850-year-old Notre-Dame Cathedral will reopen on December 7, five years after the devastating 2019 fire.

The €700m renovation has revitalized the Gothic masterpiece, preserving its historical integrity while incorporating modern safety upgrades like sprinkler systems.

The project involved 2,000 skilled craftsmen, boosting traditional trades such as stone-carving and woodwork.

Key features, including stained-glass windows and artwork, were saved, while the spire and roof timbers were reconstructed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yesman -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Notre-Dame was crumbling from hundreds of years of neglect when the hunch-back story renewed interest and the Cathedral was "restored". She's burned down several times since then.

Did the reconstruction have to honor modern building codes? Did they use modern building techniques? What about materials?

Notre-Dame isn't 850 years old. I guess I'm making a ship of Theseus argument, but who can deny that this is a modern building?

if a fire destroyed half of a historic painting, would it be acceptable to allow modern artists to stitch in new canvas and "restore" the charred painting?

Restoration is destruction. The building that stands where that historic cathedral once did is less genuine than the historic recreations in Disneyland and Las Vegas because those counterfeits don't pretend to be anything else. I recon the near universal human approval of all archival, restoration, and collection projects are all different flavors of death denial.

[–] Jtotheb 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Understandable to disagree with whether or not restoration preserves the history and soul of an architectural wonder but I have to ask—what’s the alternative? Leave it as ruins? Build something truly modern and uninspired?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Hell yea, let it be ruined, let the weeds and the vines thrive on its remains and make it ten times as beautiful as she was

[–] Jtotheb 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Lol. Cool from a universal perspective but I live in a city with plenty of run down buildings and I’ve gotta disagree. Make it a usable building or make it a useful or usable green space. Land is finite, wasted space in cities leads to sprawl elsewhere

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yea absolutely, it would be open, like a park