this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
350 points (98.3% liked)

Voyager

5650 readers
54 users here now

The official lemmy community for Voyager, an open source, mobile-first client for lemmy.

Download on App Store

Download on Play Store

Use as a Web App

Download on F-Droid

Rules

  1. Be nice.
  2. lemmy.world instance policy

Sponsor development! 👇

Number of sponsors badge

💙

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

User tags are going to be so useful. Keep up the good work, @[email protected]!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (16 children)

there is no push notification and widget like original Apollo

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago (5 children)

I think lemmy doesn't currently support push notifications so the app would have to stay awake in the background to check for them

[–] Ghostalmedia 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

You don’t need to have the app running in the background. Notifications can be pushed from the cloud.

Problem is, that costs money to host and run that job to check for notifications. This is why a lot of small developers end up burying notifications behind a paywall.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I mean yeah, but hosting and running a voyager server that stores our login credentials would be a more complicated and difficult option for what gain? The simplest solution would probably be just waking up the app every so often to check, I think eternity does that

[–] Ghostalmedia 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Speaking for iOS, I don’t believe this is possible. iOS has rules around what background processes can and can’t run on-device.

For notifications coming from the internet, in order to preserve battery life, Apple wants cloud APNs to wake up terminated apps to deliver notifications.

I know android does some similar battery preservation stuff around notifications, but I’m a little less familiar with that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

So then „bury“ it behind a paywall, why is that bad? A server costs money so let the people who want to use that server pay their part. I see no problem with that.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)