Programmer Humor

19623 readers

2835 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

Keep content in english
No advertisements
Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

129

The C++ experience (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 week ago by qaz to c/[email protected]

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Valmond 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well no because if you allocate stuff in the constructor, you are going to write a destructor now, freeing that allocated stuff up / closing that socket, pipe whatever etc.

Right?

Right??

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If I do it straight after the constructor, then definitely but if I get distracted by something else then it's only probably until I run it through valgrind and see the leak. These days, I mostly use smart pointers in new code though so there are fewer opportunities to need a destructor. It's funny that I never forget when opening a file or db connection!

[–] Valmond 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

After the constructor?

No need for a destructir bc smart pointers?

Man you does not make any sense.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Man your reading comprehension is really low.