this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
347 points (99.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

9797 readers
355 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A new study led by an international team of scientists highlights tire particles (TPs) as the leading contributor to microplastics and calls for urgent, targeted research to address their unique environmental and health risks.

Accounting for nearly one-third of all microplastics,

Fry from Futurama, shocked but not shocked meme.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pHr34kY 50 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Reducing the size and weight of a car goes a long way for environmental impact. People seem to think it's just less fuel being burned.

In reality, there is a reduction of almost every consumable. Smaller tyres. Less tyre wear. Less brake dust. Less oil used. Less chemicals when washing. Less wear on the road surface. Less manufacturing emissions. Less disposal when it's done.

The relationship isn't linear either. Doubling the weight of the car results in about 10x the surface wear.

[–] FireRetardant 5 points 1 month ago

I like to remind people of these things when they have a massive SUV but claim it is "good for the planet" just because it is electric.

No car is good for the planet. Some are better than others but they are all bad and destructive compared to nearly any alternative mode of transportation.