Star Trek

1189 readers

2 users here now

/c/StarTrek: Your safe harbored Spacedock in these Stellar Seas!

Fire up the inertial dampeners, retract all moorings and clear space dock. It's time to boldy go where no one has gone before!

~ 1. Be Civil. This is a Star Trek community and lets keep that energy. Be kind, respectful and polite to one another.

~ 2. Be Courteous. Please use the spoiler tags for any new Trek content that's been released in the past month. Check this page for lemmy formatting) for any posts. Also please keep spoilers out of the titles!

~ 3. Be Considerate. We're spread out across a lot of different instances but don't forget to follow your instances rules and the instance rules for Lemmy.world.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Why is it legal for La'an to be in Starfleet but special dispensation had to be made for Una? (self.startrek)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by FlyingSquid to c/startrek

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I was thinking about this while we've been doing the Khan memes.

La'an is a descendent of Khan, meaning she has genetically augmented DNA.

If Una had a kid and didn't augment that kid's DNA further, could that kid legally be in Starfleet?

Is there a "as long as your own personal DNA wasn't augmented, you can be in Starfleet?" Because that doesn't make much sense to me.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] setsneedtofeed 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Khan was from the 1990s. La'an was born in, what, the 2230s?

Assuming the augmentation dilutes with generations of intermixing with normal humans, I'd presume that by the time La'an comes around that she has so little difference from baseline human DNA that Starfleet doesn't care.

It's a judgment call, and I suppose that you can't put an exact line on when the augmentation is diluted enough, but in the eyes of Starfleet she is clearly past it. The spirit of the anti-augmentation laws are prevent new augments, which is supposed to prevent a case of some kind of augment takeover. La'an having a distant family line to augments doesn't seem to pose any kind of risk like that.

Una was straight up an augment. Her DNA was directly tinkered with before birth. That's exactly was Starfleet, or more precisely humanity is fearful of.

I don't think we can really look for some kind of codified judicial procedure for a situation like this. The anti-augment laws exist out of fear, and that balances against the more enlightened nature of humanity in the future. Simply, people in charge are afraid of what is Una in a way they aren't of La'an.