this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
286 points (98.3% liked)

News

23294 readers
3602 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

During a rally in Lititz, Pennsylvania, Donald Trump criticized the bulletproof glass surrounding him, joking that an assassin would need to “shoot through the fake news” to reach him, a remark aimed at the press positioned behind the glass.

He called the media “bloodsuckers” and mocked the glass’s size, referencing prior assassination attempts, including a July incident in Butler, Pennsylvania, where a bullet grazed him and an audience member was killed.

Trump added that his supporters serve as his “glass” for protection: "Glass here. There's nothing over there. They're my glass. See? Those people are my glass," Trump said, pointing to the crowd.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (13 children)

I wish we lived in a world where his words mattered to more than ~51% of the population.

Although, it does give us a more clear picture of where the values of nearly half of Americans lie – those who call themselves Patriots aren't dissimilar to those who called themselves Confederates.

Also... there's a very compelling video suggesting that it wasn't the bullet that caused his ear to bleed but a collision with the gun holster of a secret service agent when he crouched down for cover.

Edit: Found the video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TOtnYboqxQ

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Also... there's a very compelling video suggesting that it wasn't the bullet that caused his ear to bleed but a collision with the gun holster of a secret service agent when he crouched down for cover.

I'm as skeptical that an actual bullet grazed his ear as the next guy (my money's on shrapnel of some kind), but he clearly reacts and reaches up to his ear before the SS does their thing so it can't be from the huddle

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] WoahWoah 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is typical conspiracy theory crap. The entire thing is based entirely on the idea that Doug Mills faked not one but three separate photographs: 1) the bullet mid-flight, 2) the photo with blood on his hand before he goes down, and 3) the one with blood on his face while he's down.

I highly doubt Mills faked three photographs to conspire with a shooter so accurate he was able to precisely miss in order to facilitate this bizarre theory. The dude even puts the Mills' photos in his video and basically does a "fake? I'm just asking questions. Do your own research."

How this kind of crap gets and holds people's attention is beyond me. But believe what you want, it doesn't really matter one way or the other.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m just looking at the video of Trump crouching down and plausibly colliding with the holster. I don’t know how any of what you’re saying is relevant.

I’m coming for the previous belief that he was shot. However, the lack of clear injury and medical report do raise questions. It seems far more likely to me that he just smash his ear on the holster than a bullet hitting him. That’s just logical to me.

[–] WoahWoah 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's relevant because the video literally shows the Doug Mills photograph capturing Trump's blood-smeared hand immediately after he grabbed his ear, just before being tackled. So, your "logic" entails time travel, a vast conspiracy involving a NYT photographer, a hyper-accurate sniper, and fake-blood capsules—or all of the above—to explain it as the result of a holster alone.

Unless you’re inclined to believe the conspiracy theory promoted by the video—which appears to be the case, given that you're attributing the injury to an unseen holster rather than the bullet (also photographed) or bullet-related shrapnel—it would be "just logical" to trust the direct photographic evidence over a random YouTube conspiracy theory.

This is precisely how disinformation spreads. And, like many who propagate it, you don't even realize you’re doing it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I really don’t know what you’re talking about. I’m talking about the video of the actual live event which clearly shows a holster on the belt of the agent and Trump crouching down next to it. That is all. It’s clear, in the actual video, that Trump does not have blood on his hand when he checks it before he crouches down.

[–] WoahWoah 0 points 1 week ago

I'm talking about the video you linked? And I'm talking about the NYT photographer that captured an image of Trump's bloody palm after grabbing his ear seconds before the person with the holster gets there? Which is also shown in the video? That you linked? Look at you, denying reality to cling to your theory, even when it's literally in the link you yourself provided.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)