this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
80 points (90.8% liked)

Politics Without Trolls

68 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/21289050

An inconvenient truth for Jill Stein, the Green Party protest candidate for president, is that there are only two candidates who can win the presidency on Nov. 5, and she isn’t one of them.

The other inconvenient truth for her and her avowed progressive supporters is that every protest vote from the left against Vice President Kamala Harris is a vote for former President Donald Trump.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bertuccio -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yeah. I get that we have to vote for her. But she's just using Trump's fascism as a cudgel against voters to push her own shitty policies.

If she genuinely thought the election was life or death she would compromise on Israel, rather than saying we're the ones that have to keep compromising.

I get that it's stupid not to vote or vote for Trump because she won't back off on genocide - but everyone calling that out needs to call out that Kamala could fix that entirely by just deciding to be on the right side of history.

This would be a slam dunk election if they'd stop supporting genocide.

[–] Maalus 0 points 1 month ago

If, woulda, coulda. Judge a person by their actions, not an imagination of them that "could" be. People simply don't see Gaza and Palestine as an important issue. They'll ask you how dare you, when you point that out. They'll say they are pro Palestine. And then they'll vote for someone who supports the genocide. The "g" word basically lost all meaning in the US. It's treated as unavoidable, people have given up completely and are returning to normal. After all, it all happened almost a year ago!