this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
104 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

61844 readers
3846 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fluxx 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Wow, 3nm, we're nearing Moore's law ceiling, what a time to be alive. 55% is impressive to me at least.

[–] InverseParallax 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's not really 3nm, it's closer to 8, but it's still impressive.

[–] fluxx 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes, I imagine real 3nm is nearly impossible, but we're inching towards it. Still, that's very nearly the limit for conventional digital ICs.

[–] InverseParallax 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's possible, but the leakage gets ridiculous, all kinds of things have to change, we aren't near there yet.

I'm honestly amazed we got as far as we did.

[–] coffeebiscuit 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sadly it’s marketing bs for now.

[–] LetMeEatCake 13 points 2 years ago

It's been that way since ~90nm nodes. First large scale 90nm production was for a revised PS2 chip in 2003. Intel's launched in 2004.

Node names haven't lined up with node sizes for nearly 20 years now. Not a recent development.