this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
1318 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59537 readers
4150 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Signups opened this week for Loops, a short-form looping video app from the creator of Instagram alternative Pixelfed, reports TechCrunch.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yogurtwrong 135 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

I don't think TikTok community is compatible with the idea of fediverse

TikTok exists to give you large floods of endorphins via either an algorithm trained to your interests or by giving you big numbers. And this is not exclusive to TikTok, this is just how modern "social" media works, it's the sole reason why bluesky succeeded more than mastodon

Modern social media is mostly a hive mind of people affirming each other driven by algorithms. Fediverse on the other hand, always boils down to a old fashioned usenet style network made just so people can talk with each other. You can't really get addicted to fedi

I wasn't really alive during the wild west internet (im 19). I got into the net during the transition from forums to modern social media and reddit was my first social. I tried getting into facebook and instagram because everyone else was there but I just didn't like it much.

I don't know why but "the algorithm" is really boring for me. I only tried algorithm driven feeds on reddit (after u/spez) and on tumblr but the recommendations were always extremely "fake". Other sorting methods like "new" or "by most active" just feel more like as if there was someone on the other side of the keyboard

[–] [email protected] 122 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

You can’t really get addicted to fedi

Hmm... anxiously eyeing my Lemmy post history...

[–] CoggyMcFee 48 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, I’m not as addicted to Lemmy as I was with Reddit, because there aren’t as many comments and niche communities and an algorithm messing with me, but like I check Lemmy throughout each day and if I’m honest there’s not much purpose aside from getting that hit.

[–] cmbabul 6 points 3 weeks ago

I’m kinda in line with you, but I have noticed that there are more days and even weeks if I’m busy where I never look at Lemmy. I don’t think I went a full day without Reddit unless I specifically decided to for like a trip with an SO or family

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago

You can’t really get addicted to fedi

Phew, I was getting a bit worried.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

Could be worse. Could be flying squid.

[–] I_Miss_Daniel 5 points 3 weeks ago

Partly why I use Voyager with page numbers. Gives you a clear stop point.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

I had some days that I spent hours debating with people, other days I just chill and chat with people, particularly on Mastodon.

and then theres.. Lemmy, I was probably addicted to the hardest. The score system would keep me checking it and i'd be interested in keeping my score up high. I'd even argue that it made me a better human being.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago
[–] slaacaa 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

An interesting point, that a lot of younger people might not know: social media wasn’t always like this.

When I joined facebook around 2008-09, it wasn’t algorithm driven, there weren’t even ads. You had a chronological feed of your friends’ interactions, so you could see if someone posts a photo, comments something, or shares a stupid quiz. It was a very-very different feeling compared to what we have now. It was useful and practical, but the enshittification killed it.

I would never sign up for something like this today, absolutely useless - only reason I’m still there is the messaging app, which I use daily with most of my friends/family.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It's weird seeing how "the algorithm" has genuinely only made things worse. Falling into the YouTube rabbit hole was a thing, and it was entirely organic. From the loose connections of topics, you could start from any feel good funny video, and end in detailed documentary about MK Ultra.

The best algorithm was no algorithm and there's no way of ever going back to that. I feel pretty lucky to have experienced the internet before it became everything.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I don't think algorithms themselves are to blame but what they are tuned for. While engagement/eyeball hours for the adserver is the prime metric the quality of experience will be subservient to it. If the algorithms could better measure your mood and stimulation levels and maximise for that the effect would be less toxic. Ideally if it realised you were just mindlessly consuming it could suggest maybe you've done enough today and to try something else. But that I fear that is not something the owners of the various ecosystems want.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 weeks ago

my favorite feel good funny videos are about Mk Ultra and the three letter agencies (IRS FDA MSG)

[–] tired_n_bored 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I have been so happy since I've adopted the "intentional browsing" concept. It means I am the only one choosing what I want to see so I use NewPipe instead of YouTube, Mastodon instead of Twitter, Lemmy and a RSS reader instead of Reddit. My life has improved so much I am not even kidding. I feel 'clean'

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I would like to read an elaborate post about this!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

I'd be surprised if it wasn't a bit more subtle than that. While the medium really facilitate the behavior that you describe, I'm pretty sure that it also hosts sane usages, creative content and positive communities.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

I don't think anything is un-addictable (making up words here). I do agree that the social media mindset and fedi are not compatible though, basically because of the algorithm concept.

At the end of the day I hate all social media because they feed me what they think I want to eat. Regardless of how well they do that I hate the concept because I want to decide for myself what I want to partake in. Fedi allows that without getting in my way.