this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
88 points (98.9% liked)
New York Times gift articles
546 readers
138 users here now
Share your New York Times gift articles links here.
Rules:
- Only post New York Times gift article links.
Info:
- The NYT Open Team. (2021-06-23). “A New Way to Share New York Times Stories”. open.nytimes.com.
- “Gift Articles for New York Times Subscribers”. (n.d.). help.nytimes.com.
Tip:
- Google "unlocked_article_code" and limit search results to the past week.
- Mastodon: Use control-F or ⌘-F to search this page. (ref)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
What's the deal with women waiting over 30 years to announce stuff like this? Should have been more like 30 seconds to maybe 30 minutes.
Conveniently before an election no less...
Enormous pressure to keep quiet. It's nearly a cartel, speaking out at the wrong time will ruin your career and/or life.
Trump was literally quoted back in 2005 for saying "Grab them by the pussy"
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/read-donald-trumps-lewd-remarks-about-women-on-days-of-our-lives-set-2005-groping-star-a7351381.html
So again I ask, why have these women waited so damn long to speak up?
They can speak up whenever the fuck they want.
Never heard of the statute of limitations have you?
https://hermanlaw.com/state-by-state-statute-of-limitations-guide/
It's 3 years in my state, fuckall with that 30+ year wait, that shit don't fly here.
Legal ≠ equal to moral or ethical.
Also doesn't equal evidence, though I don't doubt the woman for even a second.
Why are you defending a known rapist and Epstein client?
Not defending them at all. They can both go to hell as far as I care.
I'm glad you aren't trying to defend him, but it does come across that way.
Statute of limitations is irrelevant, there's no legal proceeding here.
Never heard of 1st amendment? There is no limitation on speaking up.