this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
757 points (99.0% liked)

Political Memes

5535 readers
2675 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (12 children)

Not really, and especially on a macroeconomic level it's the opposite of the truth.

The happiness described here is not monetary. It's stuff like gay people existing. Your economic status and your queerness shouldn't correlate. So queer people being happy with their lives doesn't take away anything from anyone else.

And on a macroeconomic level, more equal societies produce more growth and thus more wealth for everyone.

[–] Redacted 6 points 1 month ago (11 children)

My bad, didn't appreciate it was referring to happiness in terms of social freedoms.

I meant for someone to have a good life without monetary worries on one side of the world it almost necessitates worse conditions elsewhere.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (6 children)

American corporatism does not equal capitalism, it's a defunct subset. European social democracies are capitalist countries, too.

[–] Redacted 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I agree but I don't understand what your point is?

Capitalism necessitates inequality in order for profit to be made.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why does it necessitate inequality? Don't you "believe" in added value? Inequality may be an outcome (complete equality is hardly possible in reality anyway) but it certainly isn't a prerequisite.

[–] Redacted 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Because workers don't receive what they put into the system in terms of effort. Profit must be made, which makes the workers unequal compared to capitalists that make the profit. Name one billionaire where their pay-to-effort ratio is worth that of say, a cleaner.

I think most "added value" is not worth as much as is made out when contrasted the amount of profit earned by shareholders.

I agree, complete equality is hardly possible but we're talking about vast wealth discrepancies which prop up the global capitalist system.

Genuinely surprised so many seemed to have missed my point here. Not sure if it's because it came across like I was supporting a conservative (I wasn't, just saying that their ideologies will always require some degree of inequality in wealth/happiness) or that there are more neolibrals on this sub than I assumed.

[–] TokenBoomer 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I got you. Capitalist markets require competition. Competition breeds inequality among individuals. Individuals get angry others get more ( money, attention, fame, power). Conservatives want to secure their status in society (hierarchy), and resort to authoritarianism to do it.

[–] TokenBoomer -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Don’t be afraid to learn about the tendency of the rate of profit to fall.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)