this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
856 points (98.9% liked)

RetroGaming

19773 readers
189 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I can't research it at the moment, but I want to say that was a common thing in the pre-NES days, and I think Nintendo required actual gameplay graphics to be shown on the box because of that.

Could be off on the specifics, but I do vaguely recall those kinds of non-representative box art having some controversy.

[–] TexasDrunk 32 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Mega Man would like a word.

1000001520

Just look at that sexy bastard.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe they got a pass if the in-game graphics were better than the box art? 😆

[–] TexasDrunk 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What do you mean? This is the greatest art in the history of art. It makes me FEEL something. Those in game graphics don't make me feel at all.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

That feeling is called nausea

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

Mind you, that was only American artwork. Original Japanese:

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

That's quite the banana hammock he's wearing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Wtf did they do to his legs??

[–] rockman057 8 points 1 month ago

Nintendo of America often used pixel art for their own box art early on in the NES era. It was similar to the in game graphics, but usually more detailed. See Metroid’s original artwork. If there was a requirement for third parties, perhaps it could be met by simply including screenshots on the back.