this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
1021 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

59780 readers
4848 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Wayback Machine back in read-only mode after DDoS, may need further maintenance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There was an actual example where a journalistic article about afghanistan accidentally leaked names of some sources and people who helped westerners in afghanistan, which did actually endanger those people’s lives.

[–] tehmics 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If they're leaked, they're leaked. The archive doesn't change that one way or the other

[–] douglasg14b 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Gotcha so you actually stated your previous question in bad faith as you had no interest in the answer to begin with.

[–] tehmics 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No. The archive of it isn't doing the dangerous part. The info was already out there and the bad actor who would do something malicious would get that info from the same place the archive did. I need you to show how the archival of information that was already released leads to a dangerous situation that didn't already exist.