this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
184 points (92.6% liked)

Showerthoughts

30366 readers
495 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted, clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts: 1

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
    • If you feel strongly that you want politics back, please volunteer as a mod.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 41 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think Hancock had a few instances of that

[–] Lauchs 6 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Never got around to that one, worth it?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Critically panned, across the board, but I enjoyed it nonetheless. It could have done with another couple of rounds of script polishing.

[–] Kyrgizion 30 points 3 months ago

It was two movies Frankensteined into one. The first half is awesome. The second, not so much.

[–] Zahille7 3 points 3 months ago

There's a deleted scene where Hancock meets a woman at a bar and takes her home. It's kinda weirdly emotional and totally should've been left in the movie imo. Here's the scene.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

It was a script undirected for 12 years

[–] Fosheze 16 points 3 months ago

It's not a good movie but it's a fun watch if you're not expecting much.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's okay, not memorable though. I can't seems to recall anything from that movie but i do remember i have fun watching it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I remember liking half of it. Oddly enough, I can't remember whether I liked the first half where he's a drunken bum, or the second half, where he's more together, but I specifically remember thinking half of it was decent at least.

So yeah, I agree that it's not very memorable.

[–] BigPotato 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You liked the drunken bum half. It just gets more stupid when the other guy's woman is a super hero too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

I mean, sort of. It was funny when she got pissed off and did some stupid stuff to make him leave. Didn't she throw a refrigerator, and him with it, through the house wall?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Have it on in the background.

I never fully understood Katherine Heigl's character and her point in the plot.

It's decent. Not great.

[–] Lauchs 1 points 3 months ago
[–] kamenlady 4 points 3 months ago

I wanted to like the movie, but drunk will smith just didn't do it at all for me.

[–] Anticorp 3 points 3 months ago

The first 2/3rds of the movie is really good. The last part is pretty bad. Overall I enjoyed it.