this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
555 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

60024 readers
3593 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Lol, no. Also, big diff between associating with and being actively married to.

Anyway I've edited my comment and I'll repeat tye edit here: You all are reading way too far into me bringing this up. Didn't say this to invalidate his point, mostly wanted to highlight something that I find most people don't know about him. It's something I think is important considering how much he styles himself as an idealogue/icon for technological freedom. He still makes good points, but the position he's doing it from should be known is all.

[–] FlyingSquid 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You do know you can be married to someone and not agree with their politics, yes?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

... yes. I'm not an idiot, thank you for the implication otherwise though. That's always nice.

Perhaps you're not familiar with just how outspoken Cory has been about all of this sort of stuff over the years. I think his wife's job is an important disclosure that has not been made, so I highlighted it. Same as a youtuber disclosing a video was a sponsorship, it could impact how their words should be interpreted, but it just as easily might not effect things in any significant way.

I've made my very minor point. I even specified in my initial comment that she is very likely involved with DRM, but not guaranteed to be.

I'd love to hear any counterpoints besides the effective equivalent of "how dare you point out a potential problem with our guy".

Only you can decide how much or how little his wife's job means. I just wanted people to be aware.

[–] FlyingSquid 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Your minor point was to associate him with his wife as if they agreed. Hence my response. I have no idea about your intelligence level, just about your apparent misunderstanding of relationships.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Please don't put words or intent on me. I've been very direct, and at the very least was not attempting to imply any such ideological agreement.

My minor point was to associate him with what appears to be the main source of his household income. No more, no less. Everyone can decide how much that means to them as they wish.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

yes. I’m not an idiot, thank you for the implication otherwise though.

I don't get it. It's like every point you appear to be making about Doctorov's association with his wife's employer is rendered invalid but you keep restating the seemingly-identical position.

One more time, maybe? "Ha ha, just pointing out whom his wife is for no bearing on the value of his opinions but you know where his wife works, right?" is a weird point to NOT be making about his credibility.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

you keep restating the seemingly-identical position

Yes, because it was literally the only thing I was trying to bring up, as I have stated repeatedly.

I'm not the one confused here. I've been straightforward about the incredibly minor point I was making. People should know who his wife works for, as it may influence their feelings on him.

Simple as. No more, no less.

Could it matter? Maybe. Maybe not.

Almost everyone responding is jumping to all sorts of conclusions about what I really meant by bringing it up. I just thought people should know the fact, as I had never seen it ever brought up until recently. For myself, it casts some of Cory's previous rants in a different light, but I'm not actively trying to sway things in any direction here.

I am getting real tired of people responding with basic ass "gotchas" pointed at shit I didn't say or bring up though, and declaring themselves some sort of winner in an argument I was never having.

Edit: Me responding so much is that I'm attempting to make it clear to every single chucklefuck. It really doesn't have anything to do with investment, as I'm having an incredibly slow day. The investment is some stupid wish that I'm not being misunderstood, which seems inevitable at this point. More attempts at clarification that I wasn't trying to impugn his credibility seem to mean the exact opposite due the little trap of "if you don't care, why are you responding so much?". Because I'm some degree of ASD and have trauma from childhood about being misunderstood. Chill.