this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
422 points (96.9% liked)

Not The Onion

12361 readers
2093 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pronell 116 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And they were there because the energy use of the MRI made them suspect it was a pot farm... in a legal state.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I agree with the legal state part, but it was not the energy use of the MRI; it was BS'd from the following:

"Franco conducted surveillance on multiple dates in 2023, reporting the 'distinct odor of live cannabis plant and not the odor of dried cannabis being smoked,' tinted windows–which he attributed to efforts to conceal cannabis cultivation, security cameras– which he associated with locations where cannabis is grown to prevent theft, and two individuals in similar attire at the premises – whom he concluded were performing maintenance or expanding the cultivation operation," the lawsuit alleges.

[–] Badeendje 53 points 1 month ago

Why would you conduct a raid without even finding out what the official listing for an address says they do there. Because in this case the bare minimum could have been 2 uniformed cops just ringing the bell.. or an undercover/plain clothes cop making an appointment. But no.. dicks out.. full raid.. probably good overtime.

[–] DharkStare 39 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Tinted windows, security cameras, and uniforms...rock solid proof of a weed farm. /s

That describes 90% of the businesses I shop at.

[–] Omgpwnies 18 points 1 month ago

Tinted windows, security cameras, and uniforms

[–] Lost_My_Mind 14 points 1 month ago

Why do you shop at so many weed farms???

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Sounds like you buy a lot of weed.

[–] qaz 22 points 1 month ago

Distinct odor of live cannabis

I have no idea what that smells like, but this smells like a bunch of crap

[–] FuglyDuck 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That is… patently stupid.

Basically he smelled pot.

Thats the only suspicious thing in that chain of observations.

Literally every non-residential building has tinted windows in some way or another- it’s for energy conservation.

Every non residential and a fairly large number of residential buildings have cameras. Yes. To deter would be thieves, but mostly to show what happened and maybe whodunnit, if you’re lucky.

“Similar attire” what the fuck does that even mean? Uniformed? Scrubs? Shit. Everyone in almost every company all wear similar attire when going to work.

Usually job appropriate attire. Which means people doing the same job are going to be wearing “similar attire”.

“They appear to be wearing maintenance clothing- blue jeans, gray polo, tool belts that have [some kind of tools]” is a valid observation.

Or “they appear to all be wearing scrubs, as doctors and nurses wear” or “they appear to be wearing clean room suits”

But what isn’t a valid? “….to do maintenance or expand the operation.”

Well, you see a maintenance worker, them doing maintenance isn’t… too far a leap. But again, literally, every non-residential building has a maintenance guy. That ain’t suspicious.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Right?! And we can't be sure he even smelled the weed he claimed to smell. The other things could be verified by being photographed or requesting documents. But the marijuana smell, the thing that probably made the warrant approvable at all, can never be verified. I wouldn't be surprised if he made it up; hell, they do it during traffic stops so why not for a search warrant.

[–] randomdeadguy 10 points 1 month ago

wow that's incredibly obtuse