this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
779 points (97.9% liked)

RPGMemes

10179 readers
1251 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
779
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Disclaimer: this is purposefully obtuse.

Other effects in the game which explicitly state they kill you:

Shadows, succubi, massive damage, death saving throws, beholder death ray (notably not even their disintegration ray kills you), power word kill, vampires, mind flayers, night hags, drow inquisitors.

Clearly, if they intended for disintegration to kill you, they'd have said so. Since specific overrides general, and there is no general rule that disintegrated creatures are dead, I rest my case. QED.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago (21 children)

You're misreading the language. It is present-tense, not future.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 4 days ago (17 children)

I'm not misreading anything. "The creature can only..." applies a new state to the creature. After that state has been applied, or somehow reversed (unaware of any way to do this by RAW), then the creature can only be brought back to life by the means mentioned in the spell.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (16 children)

Yes you are. You're intentionally abusing a weakness in English language (present and future tense are often written the same way so must be inferred by context) to assume something clearly not intended by the 2 sentences considered holistically.

It's a funny joke. +1, but, ain't no DM takin dis Hail Mary from a player seriously. 😂

[–] thejoker954 4 points 4 days ago

I bet Brennan lee mulligan would lol.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)