this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
597 points (99.0% liked)

Science Memes

11437 readers
1412 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
597
Smart (mander.xyz)
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
58 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 192 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (7 children)

I tried to google it and it’s not super clear.

-Perelman gets his phd in russia super young and is hired at NYU/SUNY

-Publishes some groundbreaking stuff on arxiv (a free site to post white papers in math and physics) in 2002/2003

-There is some drama with another scientist who is known for stealing people’s work trying to downplay Perelman’s contribution

-Perelman quits his US jobs and returns to russia to work in math (making wayyyyyyy less money), then quits that job too and becomes a recluse

-Turns down fields medal and millennium prize (1M dollars for solving)

-Says some mathematicians are unethical but the rest of them tolerate it so they’re shit too so the whole thing is shit. Also says he doesn’t want to be put in a zoo or treated like a pet about it.

—

I’m going to go ahead and assume I don’t understand enough about being a math superstar to understand where he’s coming from, but he certainly sounds like a principled guy and now I respect him.

[–] Yokozuna 94 points 2 months ago

Punk rock as fuck. May this dude find many morsels and enjoy the morning dew for the rest of his days.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 months ago

Homie really said AMAB.

[–] TheBat 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Says some mathematicians are unethical but the rest of them tolerate it so they’re shit too so the whole thing is shit.

AMAB?

[–] untorquer 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Just a few bad apples.

[–] SkunkWorkz 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Problem:

A fruit vendor receives a shipment of 500 apples. It is known that for every bad apple in a bunch, the entire bunch spoils. The apples are packed into bunches of 10. After inspecting the shipment, the vendor finds that 5% of the apples are bad.

How many bunches of apples will spoil due to bad apples?

[–] diffusive 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

between 3 and 25, depending from the distribution... And your point is? 🤷

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

You mathnificent bastard.

[–] davidagain 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And 3 to 25 bunches is between 30 and 250 apples gone bad, so that A few bad apples could spoill half of the apples, and there you have the problem with the police force, especially of the USA where officially it's not a crime to drive a car whilst having dark skin tone but you can definitely still be summarily executed for it.

[–] diffusive 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes, i got it, but it depends from the distribution. If there is correlation on where the bad apples appears (e.g. for cultural or socio economic conditions), it is more likely that we are close to the case of 3 bunches (that is 30 apples, just 5 more than the "original" apples)

If we stop this parallelism (that is what I disagree with) and we move to the actual issue with the police, i think it's a problem with all power positions: all positions that come with power (no matter how small) attract certain kind of people. This is true from the folks that check tickets in public transportation to teachers. Police is worse because there is a lot of unchecked power and close to no accountability

The solution is not how to do bin packing of the bad apples, the solution is reducing the power, increasing accountability and add checks (e.g. while body cam have some privacy implications that i don't like, it's a step in that direction)

[–] davidagain 1 points 2 months ago

You're very right.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How many?

It's complex.

[–] untorquer 2 points 2 months ago

Don't be so hyperbolic

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Screw you apples, I'm gonna go hang with the mushrooms.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I mean math is the backbone of science and technology. And technology can lead to fucked up things.

Nuclear bombs wouldn’t be possible without fairly recent math.

Not to mention the unethical hell that is the whole financial sector / trader type where mathematicians often end up working.

And finally these days, by making new discoveries in some fields your directly contributing to the growth of AI and LLMs.

An infamous example of someone who quit math over ethical concerns (ironic given the rest of the story) is Ted Kacyznski (the unabomber), who saw math as leading to more and more advanced technology which oppresses people and destroys nature.

[–] AEsheron 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think his issues more stemmed from academia and the rat race within it, not so much the ethical issues of mathematics and what they can lead to. Just shitty crabs trying to escape the bucket.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

When you're just crabs in a bucket, be the sea slug that got dredged up with the rest.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

....and a beautiful sea slug too

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I too find economists unethical by trade. Statisticians with a gambling problem, the lot of them.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago

Goals.

[–] 474D 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Damn I didn't know mathematicians go this hard.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Most mathematicians I know go REALLY hard. There's something about the field...

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

https://web.archive.org/web/20200309104931/https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2006/08/28/manifold-destiny

This new Yorker article goes into some more detail. Apparently there was an underlying conflict between rival Chinese academics over succession of university admin postings in Beijing.

According to the article it was one Chinese dude trying to hog credit and Perelman basically went "oh i'm not brave enough for politics" and bailed. If he accepted his choice was basically becoming a conformist or getting involved by trying to improve things. He chose not to choose.

Most problems require the insights of several mathematicians in order to be solved, and the profession has evolved a standard for crediting individual contributions that is as stringent as the rules governing math itself. As Perelman put it, “If everyone is honest, it is natural to share ideas.” Many mathematicians view Yau’s conduct over the Poincaré as a violation of this basic ethic, and worry about the damage it has caused the profession. “Politics, power, and control have no legitimate role in our community, and they threaten the integrity of our field,” Phillip Griffiths said.

p.s. Also between some behavioral tics (very picky eater, refusing to trim nails, trouble socializing) and the elevated sense of justice I nominate him as an honorary autist. we stan

[–] Yokozuna 7 points 2 months ago

I'm totally for how and why he dipped out. I've made a few decisions in life in a similar fashion. But a man as principled as he is, with feelings and ideas that intense, is a hell of a thing to lose in the pursuit of truth. Just imagine, if instead of resigning to almost insurmountable odds where most would be against him, he instead chose to be a stubborn man in the opposite respect and didn't rest until the truth and was common knowledge or had created groups and institutions to further pursue it if not able to do it himself.

Things like this are way bigger than one person, and to understand the problem and try to tackle it would consume your whole life. Go on and pick some mushrooms my man. You made your contribution to society and decided the rat race isn't worth it.