this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
126 points (89.4% liked)

Technology

59682 readers
3742 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] solrize 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is this a big deal? Tons of movies have been shot with consumer camcorders which are probably worse than a modern phone camera.

[–] SpruceBringsteen 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Maybe? Depends on how it's used and if it looks good. Maybe they chose it because it looks a bit shit.

The Creator garnered some attention because it looked great while being shot on a relatively inexpensive camera. I do think people would be really surprised at what you'd get with a gimbal mounted cellphone with a 360° camera in terms of special effects integration, but this might not be their route.

[–] solrize 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I looked at the article and it turns out the phones are in humongous housings with cine lenses. So not shot with phones in the way it might sound. Citizenfour (2013 best documentary Oscar) was mostly shot with a Sony FS-100 camcorder (2K HD I'm pretty sure) that the filmmaker carried in her purse.