General Discussion

12087 readers

1 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.

🪆 About Lemmy World

🧭 Finding Communities

Feel free to ask here or over in: [email protected]!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse!

💬 Additional Discussion Focused Communities:

[email protected] - Note this is for more serious discussions.
[email protected] - The opposite of the above, for more laidback chat!
[email protected] - Into video games? Here's a place to discuss them!
[email protected] - Watched a movie and wanna talk to others about it? Here's a place to do so!
[email protected] - Want to talk politics apart from political news? Here's a community for that!

Rules

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.

0. See: Rules for Users.

No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to [email protected] or [email protected] communities.
No Ads/Spamming.
No NSFW content.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Jessica

ElectroVagrant

fubo

-18

Brianna Wu criticised Wikipedia for antisemitic bias, saying that it throws "Wikipedia's entire project of neutrality and accuracy into question". (x.com)

submitted 2 months ago by wikipediasuckscoop to c/general

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] givesomefucks 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Who gives a shit what any idiot on Twitter says?

It's a place full of literal Nazis, and if you choose that place to have a discussion it's just because you're addicted to arguing with trolls.

From her Wikipedia, that's her full time job for the last decade besides grift campaigns she never stands a chance of winning.

Edit:

And why make an entire account to post only negative posts about Wikipedia, and then barely use it?

What's going on?

[–] wikipediasuckscoop -4 points 2 months ago

And why make an entire account to post only negative posts about Wikipedia, and then barely use it?

This is a silly premise. Single-purpose shared accounts are good for security purposes, particularly if you want to expose a problematic organization whose members will stop at nothing to harass, stalk and even doxx you. You might as well argue that the accusers of Andrew Tate should be deanonymized.

https://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5417

https://reddit.com/r/wikipediacriticism/wiki/scandals