this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
1254 points (98.3% liked)

AntiTrumpAlliance

533 readers
1 users here now

About

An alliance among all who oppose Donald Trump's actions, positions, cabinet, supporters, policies, or motives. This alliance includes anyone from the left or the right; anyone from any religion or lack thereof; anyone from any country or state; any man, woman or child.

Rules

-No pro-Trump posts or comments

-No off topic posts

-Be civil

-No trolling

-Follow Lemmy terms of service

Social Media

Discord

Reddit

Other Communities

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
HLMenckenFan
[email protected]
Zealousideal_Fox900
1254
She broke him (slrpnk.net)
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/antitrumpalliance
138 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 67 points 3 months ago (4 children)

She should take the opportunity to debate an empty podium. (Mostly kidding, because when Eastwood "debated" an empty chair, he just seemed senile and silly.)

But I do think the country needs to see Tim Walz give a good schooling to JD Vance.

[–] TheLowestStone 21 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Trump wasn't going to say anything coherent anyway. Just stick Alec Baldwin up there and have him read AI generated nonsense.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Mr Conductor! No!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

snorts cocaine

Fuck yeah, sparkle sparkle sparkle!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

How about just a giant cardboard cut out with a button when pressed, just gives a random 30 second ramble from him.

It would honestly be good criticism since it would functionally be the same.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I think the country seeing more of those two would really sway votes the way I'd prefer. So I'm biased.

But gov Walz represents as very genuine and honest and caring, and the more we can see some of that on our TVs the more we can believe that a most-good-soonest kind of administration is an option.

Look. They could lose. Or Harris and Walz could be faking, even if I don't think so (or want to think so). Or gopnik fearmongering could be right and they could only be barely better than a Dump/Chance ticket.

Just give us this. We haven't had positivity and hope since prez Obama and the hope of Change[TM].

Now, as I haven't suggested everyone boycott for one particular single issue or another, I expect downvotes right to hell. So be it.

[–] InverseParallax 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I think the country seeing more of those two would really sway votes the way I’d prefer. So I’m biased.

It won't change a single vote.

It will only change the way they say they voted.

It's just like 2016 before the election, everyone is a devout libertarian, sticking by their principles.

Speaking of voter fraud, did you know nobody voted for Bush in 2004? Everyone you ask says they didn't now, weird huh?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

She should take the opportunity to debate an empty podium. (Mostly kidding, because when Eastwood "debated" an empty chair, he just seemed senile and silly.)

A whole debate with that would be silly. She could turn it into a town hall style discussion and run commercials with her debating and "waiting" on donald. He could be scared somewhere with a blankie.

Look at the debate from the start. His slow ass could barely make it to his podium before she was their to shake his hand. She was fast, confident, and looked strong to me. Donald looked like he was huffing to the stage.