this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
1146 points (96.4% liked)

politics

19196 readers
3028 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SirDerpy -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Is perpetuating false dichotomy?

[–] aesthelete 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

It's not a false dichotomy at all. The choice in this national election, like basically all national elections preceding it, is between the two major party candidates.

Since that's the reality, any actions you're taking regarding the election and its discussion can be correctly regarded as support for one candidate or the other.

So I ask you again, is derping to help get Trump elected moral or ethical?

[–] SirDerpy -3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I choose to vote to influence the 2028 POTUS election. But, you're not asking. Assume what you wish.

[–] aesthelete 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The 2028 POTUS election will not be influenced by derping to help get Trump elected, but perhaps you spelled "canceled" incorrectly.

[–] SirDerpy -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Your intent is clear. You've still not asked for mine. You've assumed it in false dichotomy, even when told otherwise. Is this "good faith"?

[–] aesthelete 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Your intent is also clear, which is why you spin in circles to not declare it outright.

As far as your overall "who cares?" line of questioning or "why should we care?" about Taylor Swift endorsing Kamala Harris...apparently you care, deeply, which is why you're here in this thread advocating against Harris.

The only false dichotomy in this thread is that we cannot care about both "winning" and the "wisdom and agency of others" (whatever the fuck that means).