this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
307 points (93.7% liked)

PC Gaming

8529 readers
1409 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 106 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Paying $700 for a locked system is crazy.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It also costs $468.68 over 7 years with the 12 month plan.

So it’s really $1168.68.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I got a great PC for that price!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

And instead of no DVD drive, you can put in a DVD RW Drive, Floppy drive, extra SSDs etc.

[–] Squizzy 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Can you expand on this, how is a 12 month pkan running for 7 years?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

He's talking about PS plus.

The "12 month plan" is meaningfully less expensive than a year of paying monthly, so he's using the cheapest option if you want to play online games (excluding sales, at least).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

The average console generation runs for 7-8 years

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

But then, assuming you’re not sailing the high seas or taking help from fit girls, you’d be spending similar amounts on the same kinds of games for the PC? Or am I mistaken somehow?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah that runs a modified version of freebsd then sony locks and closed source it And if you want to play online you need to pay

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You sure? Last I remember the "crazy" quota was paying $999 for a monitor holder branded by a fruit (a bitten fruit, not even a whole one).

Joke aside, the most amusing thing, is that you have to pay $700 for a device attached to your TV, then if you want to check a website you have to resort on your smartphone or whatever shitty browser is integrated in your "smart" TV... because PS5 don't have web browser support!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

because PS5 don't have web browser support!

That one's pretty easy though. Browsers are a HUGE attack surface for jailbreaking. It'll happen eventually anyway, but I can't say that I'm surprised

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

That's not how the enforce security works. You're either capable to secure the device without removing basic functionality, or don't.

Xbox has a browser, as any iphone/ipad out of there. If the only way for Sony to keep security is cripple functionality; it doesn't mark their device as valuable at all

(additionally, with proper web browser support you can play web videogames without have to pay Sony: would you say this also apply to Sony's choice to remove web browser?)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Weird comparison.

I already own a computer to do daily work in other areas of my life. Why not add the extra $700 to my PC budget and access 35+ years of gaming history, vs. paying $700 to access ~700 games that I can't play when the next hardware iteration drops?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, it is a gradient

Consoles are only a few rungs further down on the freedom ladder than a Windows PC. Both are somewhere near the bottom.

[–] Maggoty 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wait, what's got more game availability than a Windows PC?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Answer: A Windows PC + all of the consoles + all of the handhelds + both major mobile device brands.

It just depends on how much you're willing to sell your soul... in order to amuse yourself.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I have a PS5, but Sony has begun releasing their most popular games on windows as well. I run it would be prudent to build a nice gaming PC, even if you shove it in a TV cabinet and connect a controller to it for couch gaming. If you’re patient like me, you not only get a better gaming experience, but a broader one.

[–] Maggoty 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lmao yes but if you could only have one, a Windows PC has far more access in terms of video games.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So if a console came out next year that also exceeded Windows in the quantity of games, you which ditch your gaming PC and switch over to New Console™ in a heartbeat?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Lol no, I'd install a New Console emulator on my PC, of course

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The Switch is the only previous gen console we have an emulator for

Good luck using one for a future gen

[–] masterbaexunn 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Don't need to emulate current gen or last gen. Those games all came out on steam lmao

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

How did you get to my comment without reading the chain?

[–] Maggoty 0 points 1 month ago

It's not just quantity, it's also quality and variety. A million gacha games are useless to me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I'm hearing the word "emulation" floating on the air. That's already PC + most consoles and even Android. It wouldn't surprise me if someone out there has done something about emulating iOS but I've never taken enough interest to know.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago

Just install Linux