this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
382 points (97.5% liked)

Political Weirdos

602 readers
581 users here now

A community dedicated to the weirdest people involved in politics.

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ZILtoid1991 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

At least he didn't deny the Holocaust...

Or does he go like "it happened and it was a tragedy, but the people documenting it added an extra zero by accident..."?

[–] FlyingSquid 12 points 1 week ago

He basically said, "they had to kill the Jews out of mercy because they couldn't afford to feed them." Like they were doing something to help the victims.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Most deniers try to wrap it up in a bow. It's often "there was a disease outbreak they were trying to control", or "the death toll isn't nearly as bad as the official story", or "it would have been dumb for the Nazis to spend so many resources when they were losing the war", or "Auschwitz had a swimming pool". They rarely come right out and say it didn't happen.

It all has the same goal: make the holocaust not seem so bad so they can implement the same policies.

[–] ZILtoid1991 3 points 1 week ago

I know, I was groomed by the far-right

[–] VindictiveJudge 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

it would have been dumb for the Nazis to spend so many resources when they were losing the war

I mean, starting the war in the first place was pretty stupid, as were a great many of their other decisions. It's not like Nazis are, were, or ever will be rational actors. So wasting resources on genocide in the middle of a war they were losing was very much in-character.