this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
81 points (96.6% liked)
Fantasy books, stories, &c
2648 readers
3 users here now
Anything related to the fantasy genre
Related communities
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected] (also more niche communities)
FAQ
- What does "&c" mean? It's an old-fashioned abbreviation for et cetera.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I've always wanted to get into the discworld series but the number of books is a bit intimidating. Where's a good place to start? Is there some overarching narrative or can you read them in any order?
While there are myriad reading orders that have been devised over the years, my method with long extended series such as this one is simple: I consume them in the order in which they were produced/released.
I would slightly discourage that here. The Color of Magic is fine, but the Light Fantastic is a bit rough. Equal Rites is fine again, but doesn't really focus on the characters that make the Witches series good.
I also haven't read it, but I've seen this graphic in the past and been fascinated by it without having read any.
The city watch novels are by far my favourite. Jingo is especially amazing as a lighthearted deconstruction of xenophobia and how it functions, as well as another big theme of modern politics I can't talk about because it's a huge spoiler.
Man this would have helped me immensely. I started chronologically but this would have made more sense
I personally love the city watch books the most, which starts with Guards! Guards! and circle around themes of justice and social inequality in a way that will be satisfying if you are working class left of center. There's a sort of a timeline, but I read them wildly out of order and didn't feel the worse off for it. Pratchett really found his voice after writing a few books, so I think it's generally suggested not to start at the beginning. Each 'series' has a core motif it pokes at, but if you were only to read one to see if you liked the style... I think Going Postal?
I started with Small Gods. Which is a standalone story that takes place early chronologically. After reading that as a test to see how well I would like it. I then went to the beginning in publishing order.
Part of what makes the books brilliant is that, while there is connectivity between some of them, they are all self contained. Pratchett managed to do this without being repetitive or assuming that the reader has read all the books before the one being read. There are times when characters refer to previous books but it never happens in a way that makes you feel like you are missing something. It is useful to read the different series in order but not necessary.
Thanks for all the replies everyone!
It's non-linear to me but if something is mentioned in the book that happened in the past, I just read that book in the frame of being a prequel. It hasn't really turned into anything spoiler heavy. Though the City Watch novels are a lot more linear and tend to see a lot of character growth.