this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
707 points (96.8% liked)

Science Memes

10842 readers
2342 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
707
Don't look now (lemmy.zip)
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
30 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NewNewAccount 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Thanks! I’ve never fully grasped the concept and this really helps.

I’ve always heard it that observing was actually “measuring” and still wasn’t sure why that would impact anything but chalked it up to the quantum world being other-worldly.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Honestly physicists don't actually know what measuring is either. We don't know when exactly the system is considered "measured" in the chain of entanglement, this is called the Measurement Problem.

Answers range from "shut up don't think about it" to "there's an infinite amount of universes split from each other for each quantum event!".

[–] cynar 2 points 2 months ago

We know how it works, we just don't yet understand what is going on under the hood.

In short, quantum effects can be very obvious with small systems. The effects generally get averaged out over larger systems. A measurement inherently entangled your small system with a much larger system diluting the effect.

The blind spot is that we don't know what a quantum state IS. We know the maths behind it, but not the underlying physics model. It's likely to fall out when we unify quantum mechanics with general relativity, but we've been chipping at that for over 70 years now, with limited success.

[–] Theharpyeagle 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

To be honest I still chalk it up to that.