politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
What the actual fuck.
Oh, that's awesome. I'm a person with a diagnosed mental health issue (bi-polar). It's really cool how you're shitting on people like me and others who have similar issues. I bet a lot of soldiers have PTSD, which would also be a mental health issue. Fucking cool, right?
I doubt the guy had any mental health issues. That's just the trump shithead trying to insult the employee for doing their job.
Reread. Cheung said the guy trying to enforce the rules was having mental issues....
No not only disrespecting dead military members but mocking conditions their military experience may leave them with.
I read it. I think he's just a liar.
It can't possibly be that the Trump campaign were in the wrong, so the insults start. That asshole is always calling people names and blaming them for bullshit the Trump campaign pulls.
I am confused on which way you mean any of that. Too many do's and don'ts without specific subjects or enough context.
What's confusing? The government employee refused to let the Trump campaign break the law so the campaign made up a shitty lie about their mental health.
The campaign basically called them "crazy" to make it seem like they were just being perfectly polite and it was the "other" that was "out of control." The standard "blame, accuse and double down" when someone points out you fucked up that all of the GOP adopted from Trump.
Its just more name calling from the name callers. I completely doubt the name calling comes from a place of authenticity.
BADD is an apt acronym
Well shit, that is good. I didn't even notice.
First time I'd noticed BADD as an acronym. I'm more used to seeing GOP reinterpreted: Gaslight Obstruct Project
Yes I get all that. It is fucked up. The confusing part was the comment I replied to was not specific in subject. So it could've been read as Arlington was right or Trump was.
I believe Mango is saying that the Trump staffer is lying when he claims that the cemetery staffer had a mental health issue.
The cemetery staffer was doing his duty, but if the Trump campaign admitted that, they would admit that assaulting him was wrong. So instead, the Trump staffer deflects that criticism by claiming that the cemetery staffer was having a mental health episode.
So rather than blaming issues caused by service, the Trump staffer completely made up issues to justify their behaviour.
It's highly disrespectful to veterans either way, of course.
Trump doesn't respect dead soldiers I don't like mccain, never did and though McCain's service record is straight up dog shit that would have landed literally anyone else in federal prison many times over Trump of all people don't got a leg to stand on.
That's just the classic republican projection.
Fascists gonna fascist.
The average dumbass American probably doesn't know that Hitler didn't just kill Jews, and that their dumb, social-anxiety ridden ass will be one of the first against the wall.