politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Trying to appeal to people that spend most of the day on the internet trying to find a reason not to vote isn't a winning strategy.
If you're fine with Trump winning, you don't actually care about Palestinians, you only care about putting on a performance about caring about Palestinians for an internet audience. There's no way for a political campaign to have success by appealing to people that have this level of internet brained irrationality.
The "not committed" people decided to remove themselves from the equation, which has resulted in their concerns not being a factor in this election. If the point is to only express anger on the internet (and not accomplish any change) then congratulations, you have someone else to be angry on the internet over. Like most anger on the internet it will be heavily monetized and make some people a lot of money. But they aren't ever going to have success trying to appease people that profit off of expressing anger. Whatever they do won't be good enough because there's a profit motive to this anger.
I don't understand your logic here. Declaring yourself "uncommitted" is the only leverage you have over a party that wants your vote. Telling them "I'm gonna vote for you but I won't like it!" sounds the exact same to them as "I'm gonna vote for you and I love you!". Once they have your vote guaranteed, they no longer have to address your concerns. This movement is targeting democrats because they are perceived as more susceptible to this kind of pressure (anti genocide). However, the pressure has to be applied to have a chance of success.
It's foreign policy. Israel and Palestine was the most complex foreign policy issues in the world before October 7. Now it's even worse. Joe Biden is working hard on a ceasefire. But he's trying to get Netanyahu (who's an incompetent fraudster not all that different from Trump) to make an agreement with Hamas which just made the architect of October 7 their leader. Most people understand this isn't something that's going to be easy.
But to the "uncommitted" he's "Genocide Joe" and he's complicit in war crimes. Companies that do any business in Israel? Also complicit. Universities that do business with companies that do business in Israel? Also complicit. I saw an article the other day that was saying Radiohead is somehow complicit for playing a gig in Israel a decade ago.
So you're telling me that there's something Kamala Harris (who is Vice President in Joe Biden's administration) can do that will not make her complicit from the perspective of the "Genocide Joe" crowd? This is the problem when activists let their emotions run wild to the extent they no longer capable of any kind of compromise. There is nothing anyone can do to appease the most vocal in that group. There are many subs on this site where you get insta-banned if you deviate from the "Genocide Joe" rhetoric for even a second. People in this crowd don't want to understand any nuance or hear anything other then expression of hatred towards Israel. The pro-Palestine crowd has become such an impenetrable bubble that Harris is more likely to convince every single MAGA to vote for her before she gets people in the pro-Palestine bubble to vote for her.
That movement has gone too far down a path of hatred to be able to engage in a positive way. It's to the point now that I don't feel like the goal is to actually help Palestinians, but it now seems to be mostly about hating Israel and playing a game degrees of separation from Israel to determine if someone is with the "evil Israelis".
Bottom line, Kamala Harris isn't going to get many votes from the "Genocide Joe" crowd no matter what she does.
But take heart, none of these protests ever meant anything anyway. Just not how foreign policy works. The most likely scenario is the "Genocide Joe" you hate will eventually bring an end to the conflict, which is exactly what would've happened without the protests. It's only if Trump wins and Biden isn't able to negotiate a ceasefire before Trump takes office will your protest have had an effect. And that effect will be an extreme negative for Palestinians. Nothing good ever comes from hatred and nothing good will come for Palestinians by hating Israel and Joe Biden and everyone associated with them. But likely Harris will win without you and your protest will have accomplished nothing, which is better than the alternative where your protest made things worse for Palestinians.
Jesus fuck. Talk less and listen more.
I've read you comment. Unfortunately your two sentences were not influential in any way.
Influential enough for you to spend a half an hour barfing up a bunch mostly irrelevant bullshit.
All you have is hatred. Now you've resorted to insulting me. Your hatred has made you incapable of having a conversation. You've removed yourself from political discourse because of an inability to have conversations without being overpowered by hatred.
Try harder to think about what you want to accomplish and how to best go about accomplishing it. You're not being effective right now. Consider what you can do to actually be effective. Refusing to vote, refusing to discuss anything, throwing around insults doesn't help anyone in Gaza.
What a rich imagination you have.
Just been my experience on this platform. Not sure how accusing everyone of genocide will help Palestinians, but I suspect a lot of these people don't actually care about Palestinians, they're just addicted to feeling self-righteous. Either way, they aren't accomplishing anything positive.
You're imagining me as some amalgamation of other users you've interacted with here, and probably a good measure of whole-cloth assumptions besides. You wrote a huge post addressed to these assumptions instead of me, yet you accused me of a disinterest in conversation. You seem to have come down from your self-righteous indignation a bit, but you're still having a conversation with a phantom of your own creation. When I said 'listen more, and talk less', I didn't just mean listen to me. It's good, general advise. Take it or leave it.
As unlikely as it is cuz chump is historically shit. But possible that Harris loses. Should that happen. I hope you remember this post.
Because it woulda been real easy to turn this coinflip into a landslide. Let a genocide victim speak at the DNC and use the Lehey Law to embargo the Occupation. Cut off the bombs.
That's it. Democrats would have locked in both houses and the presidency for a generation or more. Instead of taking a victory lap right now you're here fingerwagging like the good little liberal you are.
Does AIPAC give you headpats or something? I know they're not paying you. I'm not a liberal. So I'm not dumb enough to believe that. But what do you get out of being a volunteer amateur propagandist for a genocidal bloodthirsty empire?
Don't answer that. I don't actually care. My start and finish line is genocide. If you support it in any way, I dont support you under any circumstances. Nothing else matters. Because that's the cliff of morality. If you're OK with it anywhere happening to anyone youd be ok with it here, happening to your neighbors. And that makes you less than human and not worth my time. (You owe me $5 for this reality check btw)
Why? Because a small group of people that never would've voted for Harris because of her association with "Genocide Joe" wound up not voting for Harris?
And there it is: An antisemitic conspiracy theory. You can't even have a conversation with someone on the issue without devolving to to the "Jewish puppet master" conspiracies within three replies. Yeah I'm sure a woman married to a Jew was going to be able get your vote somehow.
Antisemitism is my start and finish line. Obviously the conflict in Gaza is just something you're using to be able to give cover for your antisemitic beliefs. You don't care about Palestinians. You just hate Jews.
Dehumanizing me now too? Wow you're speed-running all the fascist boxes here aren't you?
Typical liberal.
Well. Enjoy the election. I'll be enjoying the tiktoks and shitposts no matter which liberal wins.
We can check off hates democracy on your fascist bingo card.
I very much enjoy democracy. There's just no place for someone with a soul in this one.