this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
195 points (99.0% liked)

Spaceflight

676 readers
45 users here now

Your one-stop shop for spaceflight news and discussion.

All serious posts related to spaceflight are welcome! JAXA, ISRO, CNSA, Roscosmos, ULA, RocketLab, Firefly, Relativity, Blue Origin, etc. (Arca and Pythom, if you must).

Other related space communities:

Related meme community:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
llamacoffee
195
NASA decides to keep 2 astronauts in space until February, nixes return on troubled Boeing capsule (apnews.com)
submitted 3 months ago by teft to c/[email protected]
60 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (5 children)

I disagree, they have so much time and money investment into starliner, it has to fly again. They can't throw out 15 years of development.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sunk cost fallacy. Fuck Boeing, why should the government keep funding this?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

It's not a usual cost-plus contract, to my knowledge, the government hasn't funded it beyond the initial half billion. Boeing is taking a bath on this capsule development, needs the crew contracts to recoup, and that's why I don't believe they will abandon it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This whole thing makes me feel so sad.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

I don't know. Part of me feels a bit of glee that Boeing is having to foot the bill for their own incompetence.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

They definitely should throw away 15 years worth of development if they are unable to deliver. Any more money spent would be wasted

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

15 years of development, and they didn't manage to build rubber seals that seal.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

They're more than $1.5 billion in hole on this contract, but they must be doing some math on how many future contracts they might miss out on if they back out.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Don't throw good money after bad (or the sunk-cost fallacy).

Though it's not like all that development is lost. They retain all they've learned and developed. Just costs a bit to store the data.