this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
183 points (97.4% liked)

Weird News - Things that make you go 'hmmm'

970 readers
305 users here now

Rules:

  1. News must be from a reliable source. No tabloids or sensationalism, please.

  2. Try to keep it safe for work. Contact a moderator before posting if you have any doubts.

  3. Titles of articles must remain unchanged; however extraneous information like "Watch:" or "Look:" can be removed. Titles with trailing, non-relevant information can also be edited so long as the headline's intent remains intact.

  4. Be nice. If you've got nothing positive to say, don't say it.

Violators will be banned at mod's discretion.

Communities We Like:

-Not the Onion

-And finally...

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

Seems a bit harsh tbh

Edit: I'm copying in a response from further down the thread to hopefully centralize things rather than having multiple similar responses in multiple multiple places

It isn't about the severity of the crime.

Non violent crime being punished by jail time does nothing useful. It doesn't for drug crimes, for prostitution, for theft, for anything.

I'm kinda amazed that lemmy of all places is so against the idea of criminal justice reform.

Either the system does something useful, or it needs changing. If jail time has a point other than fucking up the life of the criminal, I sure as hell can't see it for non violent crime. Even for some violent crime, chances are that the criminal would have a better chance of being reformed by other methods than plain segregation from society, but at least that can claim to be a benefit by virtue of preventing the criminal from being violent at large.

IDGAF about who someone steals from, what they stole, or why. I care about making the best effort to A: reduce the chances of it happening again, and B: having the thief making restitution in one way or another. Jail achieves neither of those.

[–] frickineh 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don't know, she stole food meant for low income kids. That's appallingly immoral in my book. For a lot of kids, the meals they get at (or in this case from) school are the only meals they may get, and I'm positive the pandemic didn't improve that situation for a lot of people.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

This was organized crime by a corrupt school official. This isn't petty crime. So I don't think this situation is one of those that "does nothing useful" to have severe consequences. Additionally, your dismissal of the circumstances around the crime seems odd. This person stole from the most vulnerable where restitution isn't possible because we don't have time machines and they stole an amount that restitution is beyond the means of the thief without further commiting theft or fraud.

Jail is the best option here. I think the sentencing could be lighter and the parole and probation system should be fixed, but there's not much better to be done in a scenario like this.

Also I think making kids starve constitues violence.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 months ago

Does nobody read articles?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If someone stole $1.5m from a bank they'd probably get similar or more

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Probably, but I still think that's a bit much if it wasn't armed robbery

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Literally causing the starvation of hungry children used to be punished by mob beating to death. I think she is getting of quite lightly, and will probably make a profit when she gets out in like two years and does a right wing media circus tour.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The mistakes of the past being used as an excuse to keep making lesser mistakes is pretty damn lame.

Does the sentence do anything other than make people feel better because it's punishment?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think it’s also important for you to understand the context that a non-violent woman is unlikely to serve more than a third of her initial sentence which is where these numbers come from.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's a good thing, not a bad one. But my objection still stands. It's a harsh sentence for a non violent crime. Which, if harsh sentences did any good, I wouldn't object. But they don't.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

How would you handle someone that intentionally starved thousands of children? It’s not like this was some broke starving person stealing a tampon, they had a stable, well paying executive job and made an intentional choice.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Hyperbole isn't useful either.

This was not literal starvation. Shitty, underhanded, and illegal, but not starvation. If you're going to insist on exaggerating the issue, please don't bother me.

I'll say it again, it doesn't matter what the non violent crime is, you make the justice about fixing what they did. I'm not sure where in the thread I said it, but I suggested a decade of community service working in the very program stolen from, under heavy supervision.