this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
762 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19128 readers
2551 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] raef 28 points 3 months ago (4 children)

I feel like there's be some ethical, possibly legal, problem with presenting an imposter as an opponent at an official debate. It's a bad precedent. Besides, Baldwin comes with too much baggage right now

[–] dezmd 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Shane Gillis gets the Trump scumbaggery down just right.

[–] paf0 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It takes a scumbag to play a scumbag.

[–] SkyezOpen 4 points 3 months ago

Oh boy what'd he do?

[–] Crowfiend 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Besides, ~~Baldwin~~ Trump comes with too much baggage right now

Really? baggage is what makes him worse than Trump?

[–] raef 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I didn't say he was worse than Trump, just that running a shoddy film production that culminated in him fatally shooting someone doesn't make him a good associate of a presidential candidate

[–] Crowfiend 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I would argue that 34 felony counts doesn't make Trump a good presidential candidate, but that didn't stop him. What's Alec Baldwin gonna do that will stop him from running at this point??

[–] raef 11 points 3 months ago

I don't think anyone here is going to dispute that. Just that Harris doesn't need to associate herself with Baldwin

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot 2 points 3 months ago

They could replace him with Harrison Ford again.

[–] Red_October 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sure there would be trouble if they honestly and seriously tried to get him to present himself as the real Trump. Parody however is free and clear.

[–] raef 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There are FEC rules about debates:

"The debate must include at least two candidates and must be structured so that it does not promote or advance one candidate over another. (FEC.gov)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

They should just have her on SNL sending multiple trumps at once. Probably at least Baldwin and James Austin Johnson.