this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
826 points (97.9% liked)
Programmer Humor
19187 readers
1343 users here now
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Rules
- Keep content in english
- No advertisements
- Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If I ever saw a Github commit history like that, I'd be concerned.
Quality over quantity, hackers.
When it comes to commits, single feature / scoped commits are quality. So this git history is actually underwhelming if the author is full time. This is a good read.
I'm familiar with and practice atomic committing habits. Still seems excessive.
Mine looks a little like that. It's my job though. Everything's on GitHub.
That article also mentions squashing merges though, which would lower the contribution count by a lot unless there's a GitHub setting to have separate branch commits tracked that I'm missing out on.