this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
313 points (89.8% liked)

Political Memes

5628 readers
2771 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 72 points 5 months ago (3 children)

The amount of people here calling themselves ‘far-left’ and regurgitating republican talking points is insane.

Going from calling Biden too old (which isn’t wrong but he’s still the best viable option) to defending Russia’s invasion of Ukraine seamlessly.

[–] lennybird 21 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

(which isn’t wrong but he’s still the best viable option)

Whoa, hey now I very much object to the certainty of this claim.

Yeah, David Axelrod, senior Obama strategist credited with Obama's successful elections, Obama speech-writers and communications director, and now numerous long-serving Congressional democrats disagree but, totally the best viable option despite poll after poll showing he's massively down and Biden's own current campaign strategists reporting they see no viable path.

If your ship hit the iceberg and is taking on water, any other nearby vessel is a better alternative. At worst, it's in the same condition. At best, it's not fucking sinking. 75% of likely voters say Biden is too old to run and Democrats have a better chance with someone else at defeating Trump.

Disclaimer: we need to jump ship now but I'll vote for a corpse over Donald Trump. I just think we'll lose if we stick with Biden and the data shows it.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Then the Democrats can pick someone else NOW and rally behind them. This constant undermining of Biden while not providing a good alternative and promoting them is just hurting Democrats chances to save democracy. This is irresponsible on such an obvious level I have to assume they are trying to lose the presidency.

[–] lennybird 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

It's all about pressuring Biden in time before his nomination is locked in by the delegates. The moment that happens, this ends for better or worse.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

If you're going to pressure an incumbent into dropping out you can't lead with "we'll figure out who the nominee is who can beat Trump eventually". You come to the board with a game plan and evidence. Calling for him to step down is fucking sabotage without all of that.

[–] PugJesus 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There's a Catch-22 here. Anyone who announces they're willing becomes persona non grata and nonviable, for stabbing the current candidate in the back before he's stepped down. But why would he step down if he can only be pressured if viable candidates have announced against him?

Which is why Harris, unfortunately, is most likely to nab the nomination. She's in just the right position to imply that she's ready to step up without saying anything that would lead to her being seen as 'not a team player' and troublesome for the party.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Anyone who announces they’re willing becomes persona non grata and nonviable, for stabbing the current candidate in the back before he’s stepped down.

None of this should have been done in public. Democrats calling for Biden to step down 1 day after the debate are idiots. This is internal party politics and while it would have leaked, it wouldn't have been democrats blasting their own party leader in public. They should have figured out who was the most popular, got a backup, got their support, and then went to Biden's campaign with their evidence. Then if he refused to step down, they maybe could do so in public. Or just wait for the pundits to trash Biden on their own instead of adding to it.

Division this late is the game is damning. Also Democrats are fair-weather supporters to a T. 1 bad debate and they throw the sitting POTUS under the bus? Yeah he looked old and made mistakes. But he isn't a fucking fascist. It's just unbelievable when Trump has been shitting the bed 24/7 for years.

[–] PugJesus 9 points 5 months ago

The problem is there have been rumors of this kind of backdoor objection going on for a while now. I dismissed them as gossip at the time, but now that Congress members have gone public, I'm more inclined to believe them. These members going public, including a Senator, sounds much more like desperation after exhausting the quiet options.

It’s just unbelievable when Trump has been shitting the bed 24/7 for years.

It is deeply unfair that the Democratic presidential candidate must show exceptional performance, while the fascist presidential candidate can skate by shitting his pants and demanding his followers shit themselves in solidarity, but we're appealing to two different demographics.

[–] lennybird 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I think you're looking at this all wrong. All data points to an inevitable Biden loss. Once you accept that, then the question of the alternative almost doesn't matter.

The problem is that you cannot in good conscience say that an 81-year-old with THAT debate performance is truly the best Democrats have to muster. If true, then that's fucking sad.

Now, I've written many write-ups, and now data supports it, showing that any alternative including Harris would fair better. Win? Not necessarily. But have a better chance? Absofuckinglutely.

  • A Harris path is better.
  • An open convention is to me even better with solid reasons for why, if you're interested.
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Biden has to willingly step down, the Dem leadership made it clear they won’t attempt to force him. Progressives can’t try to force it either or they will be excised from the party and simultaneously blamed for the inevitable loss.

Biden hasn’t held a full cabinet meeting since last year, so 25th amendment probably not happening either.

And so, ramping up the pressure on Biden to do the right thing by stepping down is the only viable option at this time. It sucks, but this is the bed Biden and the DNC made to lie in.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I'm not sure I'd put much stock in modern polling.

A study suggests the debate had very little impact, but even if it didn't, historically, changing candidates this late hasn't worked out.

https://boingboing.net/2024/07/10/impacts-of-the-presidential-debate-far-overestimated.html

[–] lennybird 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Discussion aside, wtaf is boingboing.net? I'm even hesitant to click that link.

  • Reliable pollsters are accurate albeit snapshots in time.

  • Aggregate reliable polls even more so.

  • Nate Silver's algorithm is over 90% accurate in its prediction model across thousands of races over the years.

  • Cook Political Report is the gold standard.

  • Even internal polls reported by democratic Congressional campaigns as well as the President's team themselves admit they're behind.

  • They were 10 points up at this time in 2020.

  • If you aren't going off this, what ARE you going off of, vibes? In one breath you say don't put stock in polls, then point to an outlier? I mean, what!?

So you can't comfort me saying that when Biden should've come out 1 step ahead from that debate, he is not maybe only 1 step back as he has been for ages, but possibly 2 steps back.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How do you not know boingboing.net?

Anyway, that's not the source, but Rawstory doesn't allow ad-blockers, so I linked that synopsis.

https://www.rawstory.com/rs-exclusive/biden-debate-2668724330/

None of those, including my link, is accurate enough to really matter, especially this far from the election.

[–] lennybird 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Thanks. Yeah I genuinely never heard of that site in my life. Seems like it's been around since forever, too.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

To be fair, it used to be a much better, more relevant site, which I only remember because I've been around since forever too.

[–] PugJesus -1 points 5 months ago

Unfortunately, historically, a split like this is unprecedented. By coming out against Biden publicly, Democratic congressmembers have forced the issue, and it's not going to result in Biden remaining our best chance, even IF he would have remained our best chance had they remained publicly silent.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Axelrod’s jobs sound like he pretty much retired from active politics

[–] Pilferjinx 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 2 points 5 months ago

To be fair not many people want to fuck Trump.

Boebs would probably take him to a dark theatre though.

[–] PugJesus 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, Biden may have lost too much support from his own party at this point. It's probably necessary for him to step down, regardless. You don't get Congresscritters of your own party calling for the presumptive nominee and incumbent to step down unless it looks godawful going into the election with the current ticket.

It's probably going to be Harris if he is replaced, which I'm... not thrilled with. But Blue no matter who. I'll vote for Biden if he's on the ticket in November - I'll vote for a fucking potato if I have to in order to oppose fascism. But he very well may be an electoral liability at this point, not a boon.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

He'd be stepping down into the void. The primaries are mostly over. It'd just be the DNC deciding for themselves who the candidate would be. That would NOT please most voters. It's typical for an incumbent to be the nominee for a second term. It's not typical for a party to just decide who the candidate would be.

It’s probably going to be Harris if he is replaced, which I’m… not thrilled with.

If that's who they choose they need to decide now and start talking her up, even if Biden doesn't step down right away. We are past primary season. And honestly, she's fine. Not good fine. But she'll lose to Trump. Not for any part of her own merit or policies, but because America is a sexist, racist country and I do not have any confidence in them electing a black woman. Maybe is she was popular or charismatic like Obama was but we haven't really seen her do much.

[–] PugJesus 2 points 5 months ago

If that’s who they choose they need to decide now and start talking her up, even if Biden doesn’t step down right away. We are past primary season. And honestly, she’s fine. Not good fine. But she’ll lose to Trump.

Unfortunately, while I share some of your reservations, I think the ball's in motion. We can let it roll (pick a new candidate) or get crushed by it (stick with Biden and have the millstone of defections hanging around our necks the entire election season), but either way, it's going where it's going. We have to deal with it as best we can, not deal with it the way that we would've, say, two months ago, before this went down.