this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
1182 points (95.0% liked)

Political Memes

5445 readers
3701 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That doesn't happen either. You get "Communism with Chinese characteristics". You get the USSR that falls apart and was never really communist to begin with. You get Cuba with great food and nice looking old cars, but in an otherwise isolated and somewhat dire state and in consistent poverty. You wind up with Russia with sham elections and an international alliance of creeps including North Korea. You get czars and emperors masquerading as "presidents". It's all a worthless facade: still authoritarianism but comrade-chic; dictatorship but by che guevara wannabes.

So 1. You get drastic improvements on material conditions for the vast majority of people as opposed to life under the nationalist KMT

  1. You get a doubling of life expectancy, massive increases in literacy rates, housing rates, free education, and consistent growth in a Socialist economy until it liberalized and collapsed

  2. You get a functioning country doing the best it can for its people despite a brutal blockade designed to punish the people for throwing off their fascist dictator and slave society

Not sure what your point is here.

I don't like capitalism either, and I think Marx's critiques of it are well founded. He just doesn't have a prescription: exactly like many other analysts throughout history and various wanton technocrats today.

He does, did, and I linked the sources. The fact that you're ignoring this directly in spite of said sources is incredibly dishonest.

I'll stick with democracy until the cossacks come knocking at the door thank you very much, and I'll do it while reading whatever I please instead of useless theory.

Capitalism cannot be truly democratic, only Socialism can be. If you don't want to read theory that is your personal choice to make, but that also makes all of your opinions of said theory worthless.

[–] aesthelete -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

He does, did, and I linked the sources.

You're right, he does have a prescription...it's just one that doesn't work in practice despite being tried over and over again for more than a century at this point.

Capitalism cannot be truly democratic, only Socialism can be.

Sure seems like this country at least gets a say in voting for who runs it, unlike many, many socialist examples (with great reading scores! yay!) where they are not only not doing that, but it is prohibited structurally (or behind the scenes through radioactive tea administration).

Also, don't bend my ear with all the grand achievements of socialist countries that are decidedly not democratic and then pay lip service to democracy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You're right, he does have a prescription...it's just one that doesn't work in practice despite being tried over and over again for more than a century at this point.

It does and has worked. What do you believe is sufficient to decide if something does or does not work?

Sure seems like this country at least gets a say in voting for who runs it, unlike many, many socialist examples (with great reading scores! yay!) where they are not only not doing that, but it is prohibited structurally (or behind the scenes through radioactive tea administration).

Socialist countries do in fact have elections, voting, and so forth.

Also, don't bend my ear with all the grand achievements of socialist countries that are decidedly not democratic and then pay lip service to democracy.

Why not? Why do you say Socialist countries aren't democratic?

[–] aesthelete 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Why not? Why do you say Socialist countries aren’t democratic?

What countries are you counting?

The former USSR, China, Cuba, North Korea, and on and on do not hold elections.

The northern European (and other socialist-lite countries) that are closer to what I would want for America didn't abolish capitalism... So...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The USSR, PRC, Cuba, and DPRK all hold elections and practice(ed) some form of democracy.

They were not structured like Capitalist elections, but nonetheless had and have elections.

Social Democracy depends on Imperialism and Capitalism in the global north, is inherently unsustainable, and sees sliding of worker protections and rights over time, just like what happened following the New Deal in America. Reading theory makes it clear why.

[–] aesthelete 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

The USSR, PRC, Cuba, and DPRK all hold elections and practice(ed) some form of democracy.

Lol, alrighty we're done here. 😆

Edit: The only time tankies believe in voting is when they're on lemmy hitting the downvote icon on the deep posts. 😜

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not even checking the links? It's wikipedia, lol

[–] aesthelete 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They're sham elections. You telling me that fucking haircut in the DPRK is God emperor of North Korea because he has some mandate from the masses? He's atop the throne because he's the son of the last blowhard.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] aesthelete 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

George W. Bush was elected.

When's the last time haircut doofus had an actual election that he didn't somehow manage 106% of the vote in?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] aesthelete 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Kim Jong Un did not stand for election, marking the first time that a North Korean leader did not participate as a candidate.

He's not even pretending anymore because he knows he's God Emperor for life.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You do realize you've moved the goal posts over time, right? Flawed democracy is still democracy, and if you're going to pretend it isn't then we have to agree that the US isn't a democracy either.

[–] aesthelete 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Flawed democracy is still democracy

Not voting at all for your leadership isn't democracy.

It has nothing to do with flaws, of course countries have flaws.

If Trump manages to turn the country into full on dictatorship I'd acknowledge that as what it is, instead of pretending that it's a flourishing democracy.

Besides all of this, China hasn't even gotten rid of capitalism anyway. So they're not only a dictatorship but they're also practically a fascist one with worker aesthetics.

Half of the shit we buy in America is made in China by wage slaves who cannot advocate for themselves under threat of being carried off to jail or executed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not voting at all for your leadership isn't democracy.

They do, though.

Besides all of this, China hasn't even gotten rid of capitalism anyway. So they're not only a dictatorship but they're also practically a fascist one with worker aesthetics.

China has elections, so not sure why you're calling "fascist," it's closer to a Social Democracy.

Half of the shit we buy in America is made in China by wage slaves who cannot advocate for themselves under threat of being carried off to jail or executed.

Mind finding some sources of this happening?

All in all, you're deeply goofy. It's like you believe everything the US state department says.

Try watching a video of two guys going to North Korea to get a haircut.

[–] aesthelete 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Nah I'm good on pyong yang propaganda. You're fucking goofy. Touch grass you dumb bootlicker.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yes, pyongyang propaganda from a pair of aussies touching grass.

I think you need to take your own advice and stop watching Joe Rogan.

[–] aesthelete 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm out touching grass right now and Joe Rogan can eat a dick along with your favorites fucking pooh bear and the tiny penis moron who looks like he accidentally walked into a hedge cutter.

Also Australia sucks y'all are a bunch of American wannabes.

✌️

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Homophobia, racism, ableism, and more racism, lmao.

Guess Joe Rogan is too progressive for you, maybe Ben Shapiro or Nick Fuentes is more your speed?

Not even Australian myself lol