this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
-4 points (35.7% liked)

onlyvideos

142 readers
2 users here now

Only Videos

Rules

  1. Try to be as civil as you can be; No Spamming/Trolling; ban for x days if problems arise
  2. Videos only
  3. Follow the global rules.
  4. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 

We discuss the plea deal and release of Julian Assange with press freedom advocate Trevor Timm. “Thankfully, Julian Assange is finally going free today, but the press freedom implications remain to be seen,” says Timm, who explains the U.S. espionage case against Assange, which was opened under the Trump administration and continued under Biden. Timm expresses disappointment that Biden chose to continue prosecuting Assange rather than demonstrating his stated support of press freedom. If convicted, Assange could have been sentenced to 175 years in U.S. prison, which Timm calls a “ticking time bomb for press freedom rights.”

Transcript: https://www.democracynow.org/2024/6/25/julian_assange_freed_from_prison_pt2

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jimmydoreisalefty -3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Selectively exposing crimes is possibly worse than hiding them altogether.

I am not sure how I would even respond to this type of thinking, I will just restate the quote below:

“When exposing a crime is treated as committing a crime, you are being ruled by criminals.” ― Edward Snowden

[–] almar_quigley 1 points 5 months ago

I’m talking about Assange choosing to withhold certain knowledge/information on trump prior to the election. Are you saying that’s not a thing that happened? Because I feel like that’s a pretty well known fact. He actively sabotaged Hillary’s campaign in favor of Trump. He’s not the reason she lost but certainly didn’t help and certainly showed his true colors.