this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
751 points (97.7% liked)

Science Memes

9150 readers
2929 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Sister Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kemsat 19 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Having a PhD doesn’t say you’re intelligent. It says you’re determined & hardworking.

[–] cabron_offsets 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Eh. Maybe. but don’t discount those phds who were pushed through the process because their advisors were just exhausted by them. i have known too many 10th year students. They weren’t determined or hardworking. They simply couldn’t face up to their shit decisions, bad luck, or intellectual limits.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In 1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Pushed through? In my experience those candidates are encouraged to drop out.

[–] cabron_offsets 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

There are practical matters, some quite controversial, that you aren’t considering.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Probably. What are you referring to exactly?

[–] cabron_offsets 2 points 3 days ago

Let’s just say that demographics play a critical role in future grant applications.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not everywhere, I guess. The advisor needs to show good numbers to the ~~stakeholders~~ board, after all

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think that's on the entrance selection committee, not the supervisor. (Although they are probably part of that committee)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

I don't know for sure, but my advisor used to worry about the amount of successful PhD graduates, because of the department quota, iirc

on the other handhis quota was not too high, and he allowed me to enroll and was okay with me, although I said in advance that I will likely become a drop out

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Depends if its profitable or not, including in the long run.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In 2 points 3 days ago

Yes. Short term easy passes come at the expense of sacrificing long term reputation.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

A scientist says Britney is really pretty, the press reports scientist thinks Britney is hot, lemmy gets mad because her core temperature is the same as most humans.

What they're really claiming is it'll have PhD level proficiency at certain tasks, that is if you asked an average PhD student to code a pathfinder algorithm GPT would produce similar level output. Likewise if you want it to write an explanation of centrifugal force it could output the same quality essay as the average PhD student.

They're not saying that it'll have agency, emotion, or self-awareness. They're not saying it'll have the colloquial understanding of intelligence or wisdom, they're using intelligence in its normal use in animal biology and computer science where it refers to an organism changing its behavior in response to stimulus in a way that benefits the organism - a worm moving away from light because this will increase its survivability is intelligence, a program selecting word order that earns it a higher score is intelligence.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ah right, everyone was wrong the whole time. See everyone! This right here makes all of it make sense! We can all stop making fun of the statement for being ridiculous, because clearly we are just bad readers. Thank you man likely wearing a cape!

[–] Promethiel 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Your comment, but without irony or sarcastic pretention. What exactly do you think semantics are?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Something unnecessary, certainly