this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
-19 points (12.0% liked)

Jill Stein, "People Planet Peace"

34 readers
1 users here now

Community for those against and for Jill Stein!

Jill Stein is running for president to offer people a choice outside the failed two-party system. Let's put a pro-worker, anti-war, climate emergency agenda front and center in this election and on the ballot in November 2024.


Rules:

  1. Try to be as civil as you can be; No Spamming/Trolling; ban for x days if problems arise
  2. Follow global rules
  3. Content must be relevant to JS or issues discussed by them
  4. Personal attack - Attack the argument, not the person
  5. No Porn/Nudity in posts

Go to JillStein2024.com to join us!


FOLLOW JILL:

  1. Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@JillStein2024
  2. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/drjillstein
  3. Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/jillstein2024
  4. X: https://twitter.com/DrJillStein
  5. TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@drjillstein

Jill Stein is a Harvard-educated doctor, a pioneering environmental health advocate, and an organizer for people, planet, and peace. She has helped lead initiatives to fight environmental racism, injustice, and pollution, to promote healthy communities, and to revitalize democracy. She has helped win victories in campaign finance reform, racially-just redistricting, and the clean-up of incinerators, coal plants, and other toxic threats. She was a principal organizer for the Global Climate Convergence for People, Planet, and Peace over Profit.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 

@CallForCongress

Corporate media just lies and lies and lies…

@DrJillStein currently is on enough ballots to potentially win 279 electoral college votes

Yet Salon says neither she nor Kennedy have a pathway to 270

Lies and lies and lies

https://www.salon.com/2024/06/23/no-debate-rfk-jr-is-a-to-democracy/

Source: https://x.com/CallForCongress/status/1804972558787498248

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ChihuahuaOfDoom 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Just because you may not like the truth doesn't make it a lie. They don't have a pathway to 270 even if there is a mathematical possibility. Just because something is possible does not make it plausible.

[–] jimmydoreisalefty 0 points 7 months ago

Yes, that is why Jason said "potentially win 279 electoral college votes"

No one is talking absolutes, when talking about a non status quo party winning.

Just because something is possible does not make it plausible.

True, but the problem at hand has much more to do with the legacy media framing and talking points, so as to downplay other contenders that have a 'possibility' of winning said electoral college votes.