Science Memes

10461 readers

2770 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
Keep it rooted (on topic).
No spam.
Infographics welcome, get schooled.

Research Committee

[email protected]

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

259

Irrational (mander.xyz)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

56 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

ORLY?

Please take your evening off to explain to the common man how electrons are distributed without restoring to quantisation.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

That’s not what I said?

They’re “stable” energy states. That’s all.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

If you want my credentials, the second book is deriving the hydrogen atom.

[–] Ziglin 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

And that they might still move continuously. Which is impossible to prove (see Planck length).

Edit: Corrected my statement based on the reply

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

That’s not what Planck length is. It’s the minimum resolvable accuracy not measurement. Meaning we can’t prove something was somewhere specific beyond the Planck length. Not that it’s the building size of the universe.

https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_length#:~:text=It%20is%20about%201.616255,Planck%20length%20per%20Planck%20time.

it is a common misconception that it is the inherent “pixel size” or smallest possible length of the universe.[1] If a length smaller than this is used in any measurement, then it has a chance of being wrong due to quantum uncertainty

[–] Ziglin 1 points 3 months ago

That is actually good to know, it answers a lot of questions I've had about the universe.