Microblog Memes

5719 readers

4412 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
Be nice.
No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

ReadyUser31

aeronmelon

547

Facts. (lemmy.world)

submitted 4 months ago by BonesOfTheMoon to c/microblogmemes

36 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] glimse -5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So what does his cover bring to the table? And do you think it would be as big as it is without his name attached to it?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

I think the perspective is very valuable. When Trent wrote the song, he was still young. It gives time to atone, to grow, to do better. When Cash covered it, it was near the end of his life. He doesn't have the luxury of time to make up for his shortcomings. It's a lot more fatalistic.

To answer your second question, no. I don't think it would be as big without his name attached. Johnny Cash was so big, so iconic, that of course anything attached to him would get more attention. And the fact that more people are familiar with his life story and why this song would resonate so deeply with him definitely helped to spread the cover as well.

To answer your unasked third question, personally I prefer the original. I do appreciate Cash's cover though, and am glad he made it.