this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2024
776 points (96.5% liked)

People Twitter

5466 readers
1021 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (3 children)

My new TV maxes out at 120 and I hate it. What sort of scale is that?

Especially considering that anything in excess of about 12 is deafening.

[–] VindictiveJudge 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

My car uses an even more fucked scale. It tops out at 63, of all numbers.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago

It's because the volume is stored in a 2^6

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

My Corolla goes up one from 63 to "max" , which is a number I've never heard of.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] VindictiveJudge 2 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I was thinking maybe it has to do with 0-63 being 64 numbers which could be a small convenient bit storage. But that's 6 fucking bits which as far as I know nothing really stores in values lower than a byte. Maybe there is some chip somewhere and 6 bits are used for volume and the other bits are getting used for other things. It's still a very weird value to have

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Even a fucking boolean is stored in a byte.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Right? A 6bit number makes so little sense. Where'd the other bits go, what did they do with them, why can't we have a full byte??

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

120 has a lot of factors. It's a good number for a lot of situations. But IDK why it would be desirable to be able to set the TV to one sixth of its max volume when sound doesn't scale linearly anyway.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

This is why the objectively right way to display volume is how most avr’s do it, in decibels.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

120 is way better than 100

It's a multiple of every number you can count on your hands except for 7 and 9

A direct improvement over 100, which misses out on 3, 6, 7, 8, and 9 (half of them!)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

the main reason why feet are 12 inches and great for carpentry math.. divisible by 1,2,3,4, and 6