this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
66 points (72.3% liked)

World News

39523 readers
2555 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] slurpinderpin 1 points 7 months ago (3 children)

But but people here told me they’re just freedom fighters!

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

They're not "just" freedom fighters: they ARE freedom fighters, but they are also conservative religious freedom fighters who utilize indiscriminate violence to advance their cause of by any means necessary.

They are not morally upright heroes. I can't support what they did. They are, however, also still freedom fighters. And it makes me very, very angry that their tactics have been successful after non-violence failed in 2018. It shouldn't have come to this.

As Kennedy astutely observed, “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable”.

I cannot endorse the violence Hamas employs, but I also understand in such a context why others do. This was an inevitable outcome of extreme political disenfranchisement, and that makes me equally furious at the joint responsibility I see for the atrocities that have resulted.

[–] TimeNaan 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That was well put, I don't know why all the downvotes?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I didn't downvote, but I would argue that you can't call someone a freedom fighter if their ideology or political position fundamentally opposes freedom, just because they are fighting for the cause of one particular oppressed group. To put a comparison: some Ukrainians that fought against the Soviet Union during WWII could have seen themselves as freedom fighters who were fighting for the right of self-determination of their nation (as they were fighting a dictatorship, and that was probably their main intention), but you absolutely cannot call yourself a freedom fighter when you're helping the nazis occupy half of Europe.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Banderites were fascists and contributed to plenty of massacres but they also fought the Nazis because they didn't feel like bending the knee to Hitler, unlike, say, the Ustaša. In that sense they weren't collaborationists. It's why the whole national hero emotionality surrounding Bandera gets so frustratingly complicated.

Makhno is a much more suitable national hero but he was on nobody's mind as the very idea or existence of Anarchism was suppressed in the USSR while Bandera was a suitable boogeyman. "Enemy of my oppressor is my hero" kind of mechanism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Still, I hope my metaphor went across.

[–] slurpinderpin 5 points 7 months ago

Ok, fair enough

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (26 children)

What do you think freedom fighters are? The fact that they are fighting for freedom does not inherently mean that they support Western values. The West does not have a monopoly on freedom.

[–] slurpinderpin 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I guess its because freedom fighter has some sort of positive connotation to many. They may be fighting for freedom, but they're also just terrorists

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Fighting for the freedom to subjugate people to their will instead of someone else's.

[–] slurpinderpin 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, not really a group of "freedom fighters" you'd expect people in the West to rally behind... yet here we are. Holding terrorists' flags in NYC lol

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

TIL: A bunch of flags at a rally is just as good as military support from western allies!

[–] slurpinderpin 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I guess I was more pointing toward the dark irony of waving terrorist flags in NYC

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] slurpinderpin 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Literally just yesterday, someone responded to a comment of mine about the peace deal “there is a genocide going on, they’re just freedom fighters” in reference to Hamas. LMAO

[–] FlyingSquid -3 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] slurpinderpin 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Oh its a common sentiment on this site - that wasn't the first, or second, or third, time someone has said something similar. There's a common thing here where people look at a losing side and think it's a cause worthy of their support

[–] FlyingSquid 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I would say that the common sentiment is that Hamas and Hezbollah are terrorist organizations, but that doesn't justify killing Palestinians indiscriminately.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

How long is your instance blocklist that this one left as a common sentiment?

[–] FlyingSquid 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Are you seriously saying people being pro-Hamas is far greater than people just being against the killing of innocent people?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Hard to tell, the latter ones are usually eerily quite or will deflect when pressed about the first one.

[–] FlyingSquid 2 points 7 months ago (6 children)

Usually? How often? Let's see your data. Or is this anecdotal?

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)