this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
429 points (79.1% liked)

US Authoritarianism

804 readers
717 users here now

Hello, I am researching American crimes against humanity. . This space so far has been most strongly for memes, and that's fine.

There's other groups and you are welcome to add to them. USAuthoritarianism Linktree

See Also, my website. USAuthoritarianism.com be advised at time of writing it is basically just a donate link

Cool People: [email protected]

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 29 points 5 months ago (3 children)

the mode is probably 0.

e.g. there are plenty of people with exactly 0 income. there are few people with exactly another income.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

Yup, Wikipedia says all exponential distributions have mode 0

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponential_distribution

[–] pivot_root 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It might work a bit better if incomes were bucketed into 5k brackets before taking the mode. From there, I guess you can take the mean or median of all the incomes that comprise the bucket?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

It would still always be the lowest bracket, because most people make little and few people make much.

If you look at the horizontal lines here you get 50k brackets:
https://fourpillarfreedom.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/ind_inc0-1.jpg

The first bracket is ~65% of the population, the second bracket ~25%, the third bracket ~5%

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Maybe as a rule of thumb it would always be the lowest bracket for the US. I live in the Netherlands, and the mode here is as a rule of thumb about 79% of the average. This gives a mode of 44000 euros annually. So it doesn't have to be the lowest bracket.

[–] pivot_root 2 points 5 months ago

Well, that's depressing.

[–] Maggoty 1 points 5 months ago

That's not helpful though.