this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
892 points (96.9% liked)

US Authoritarianism

736 readers
519 users here now

Hello, I am researching American crimes against humanity. . This space so far has been most strongly for memes, and that's fine.

There's other groups and you are welcome to add to them. USAuthoritarianism Linktree

See Also, my website. USAuthoritarianism.com be advised at time of writing it is basically just a donate link

Cool People: [email protected]

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Veraxus 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Auth left is when progressives are willing to force their ideals on others, whether those ideals are social or fiscal.

No, that is not how any of that works. See the tolerance paradox.

the cultural revolution

...was rightist.

no matter how you spin it, it’s authoritarian.

Correct. Rightism is authoritarian. You keep describing rightism while trying attribute it to the left. This is usually the result of blindly accepting Tankie (extreme right) propaganda without taking the time to consider the actual definitions and requirements of leftism and leftist terminology.

[–] OccamsRazer -3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Authoritarian: "favoring or enforcing strict obedience to authority, especially that of the government, at the expense of personal freedom."

So freedom and tolerance is the opposite of authoritarianism. And yes, the paradox of tolerance means that it doesn't work to be completely tolerant because then the intolerant will eliminate or overrule the tolerant.

The conclusion from this is that some level of authoritarianism is required to enforce some level of freedom, which are inherently conflicting. That's why it's a paradox.

So are you saying that use of force, when justified by the paradox of intolerance, is not right wing? Or are you saying that even progressive movements have elements of rightism?

[–] Veraxus 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No. By your own listed definition, authority and authoritarian are different terms. You can have an authority without authoritarianism. You are conflating terminology, and I’m starting to suspect you are doing so in bad faith to perpetuate the tiresome “both sides” fallacy.

[–] OccamsRazer -5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You can't have an authority without some level of authoritarianism.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I am an authroity in electrocuting myself with car batteries, I can say with perfect authority backed by experience that it hurts like a motherfucker. Wheres the fucken authoritarianism in that statement, sure theres some amount of absolutism in that I am assuming that everyone or atleast most people find electrocution of that type painful. But thats why we have peer review and consensus, get a couple other dumbfucks who arced their car batteries and we'll find what the consensus is.

Authority is fully seperated from authoritarianism, they simply share a vague as fuck root concept.

[–] ameancow 2 points 3 months ago

I cannot figure out what that user is on about or what they are trying to warn against, I have read all their comments and it's just a lot of weird hand-wavy vibes, I am like 90% sure they're some kind of anti-woke-head trying to seed the idea that equality is the same as tyranny or some nonsense that people get hung up on obsessively.

[–] OccamsRazer -2 points 3 months ago

I'm referring to someone having Authority to uphold laws and issue punishment for not following them. Authority in the context I intended is synonymous with power rather than expertise as in your example.