this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
164 points (91.0% liked)

News

23318 readers
3782 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

"The build, visibility and reduced weight of kei trucks makes them safer than American vehicles."

Not for the occupant when in a collision with a vehicle made for the American market and not for pedestrians who, as mentioned before, are getting hit by what is basically a wall coming at them and it just so happens that said wall is a foot above the ground which changes the dynamic because the pedestrian will tend to end up under the vehicle.

"25 year old cars are generally easier and cheaper to work on because they were made to swap accessible, standard parts out easily."

You're talking about 25 years old vehicles never sold in North America to begin with, parts aren't available at your local parts store unless you find an equivalent by looking on the web and then you're relying on people having tried to come up with a solution before you.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Which market a vehicle is made for doesn't affect its physical properties by location, the truck isn't going to shape shift stateside because it's from a different country.

  • A slimmer vehicle with better visibility and reduced weight has an easier time detecting threats or victims and brakes more effectively. It is a safer vehicle on the road.

  • Any threat of driving a kei truck is a result of irresponsible American auto manufacturing, the same way bulky American vehicles disproportionately threaten pedestrians and sedans.

  • Lot of incorrect assumptions on your part here; luckily, your misjudgments are irrelevant and we can address the salient fact that there are any number of reliable import shops for old-schoolers and countless websites where you can order these parts easily.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Which market a vehicle is made for doesn't affect its physical properties

At affects the physical properties of the vehicles around it as they weren't built with the same standards in mind.

brakes more effectively

Wrong, brakes are proportional as well and it also vastly depends on contact patch, by your logic a motorcycle would outbrake a car, it doesn't. A Bugatti Veyron weights 2200kg and goes 100 to 0 in 31.4 meters, a Toyota Corolla GR does the same in 34 meters even if it weights 285kg less.

A kei car without airbags and no crumple zone at all isn't safer than a regular car from the same era, let alone a modern car. A cab over wheel is more dangerous to pedestrians than anything else because it tends to draw them under the car. Modern cars are built with pedestrian safety regulations in mind, Kei cars weren't.

Lots of incorrect assumptions on your part here, but it's always the same with people who don't actually know anything about cars except that they just want to see them off the road.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No it doesn't. Haha, why are you- whatever, it's funny.

Anecdotes are fun and similarly irrelevant to general auto standards.

And no, for regulatory, logical, and statistical sake, a cab over wheel in a properly manufactured vehicle is not more dangerous than a poorly manufactured American truck or SUV you literally cannot see the pedestrians in front of.

I do appreciate your desperation in parroting my exact wording at the end here to try to pretend you aren't playing make-believe with your anecdotes and errors, but throwing a nonsense tantrum and fabricating straw-men to rail against isn't helping your argument.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Anecdotes? I gave you numbers. Hell, need a more drastic example? Toyota Yaris, 100kph to 0, 32m and it weights... 1090kg! That's half the weight of a Veyron yet it takes a longer distance to slow it down! Hell, you love Kei trucks so much, they do a freaking stoppie if you apply the brakes too hard!

https://youtu.be/M2wUvkrmYFU

Safe as fuck, right?

How is a truck with a tall grill unsafe but a truck with a flat nose safe for pedestrians during an impact? It's the same kind of impact, one where the passenger isn't thrown on the hood!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes, that's the same very fun single irrelevant anecdote that doesn't negate the wider safer vehicular auto standards of a jei truck.

You should definitely write about the Spyder again, though.

I'm sure if you repeat it enough times, I'll eventually be convinced.

You'll at least feel better.

As for your question if you're vehicles manufactured with safety in mind are safer than vehicles with tall grills, you'll have to think(don't be scared) of the difference between braking for a pedestrian.

In one test, you can see the pedestrians in front of you through the windshield of your vehicle.

In the other, the windshield is blacked out and like many American trucks and SUVs, the pedestrian/sedan cannot be seen.

Which pedestrian or sedan do you think you'll be able to stop for on time?

The one you can clearly see, or the one you literally cannot see?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

"Anecdotes"

You keep using this word but I don't think you understand what it means...

If the pedestrian pulls up in front of you, what car stops first, the one with no contact patch, 90s drum brakes (possibly at the four wheels), no ABS or the modern car with large tires to grip the asphalt, ABS to make sure you don't lock your wheels, big disc brakes at the four wheels, development actually going into pedestrian safety?

The only place where your Kei trucks might win against a regular truck is in that narrow gap where the pedestrian jumps in front of it and is visible in the Kei truck but not in another vehicle and there's still time to start braking, if the pedestrian is too close then it loses, if the pedestrian is too far it loses again, against a sedan then forget it, the hood on the sedan is purposefully built to absorb the impact for the pedestrian, heck, they're coming up with external airbags to protect their head!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It isn't surprising you're confused about words.

Why would you stop? Because you've seen the pedestrian?

Be pretty difficult to see the pedestrian without being able to see out of your truck, wouldn't it?

One step at a time for you there.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

A lot of the kei trucks and cars have a Suzuki F6A or K6A engine that was also used in some artic cat snowmobile. That kind of commonality makes it easy enough to find parts. Worst case scenario it is a 2 weeks wait time to get the part delivered from Japan. You know what took me more than 2 weeks to get some parts? A 2015 VW golf.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

That covers your Suzuki Alto Works' engine but how much trouble was it to figure out where to get brakes for it?

😬

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Easy enough that I could get the car to pass the provincial inspection roughly a month after I got it. How long did it took you to get that Audi S2 road legal?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Call the dealer, order part VS spend hours figuring out what to order from where and hope that it's actually legit...

Never had an S2 but it wasn't for a lack of parts that I didn't get my S4 road legal

🖕