this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
89 points (81.6% liked)

World News

37304 readers
2083 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I genuinely wonder what they listed for his post-death miracles (a saint requirement). Are they technology related?

[–] madcaesar 18 points 1 month ago

It's all made up, and the points don't matter!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Did you read the article? They list them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

You caught me. I did not

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They're not the most miraculous miracles. A person might miss them if they weren't specifically searching for miracles.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

I mean, yes and no. You read the article and think, “that…sounds like bullshit.” You don’t read the article, read the two paragraphs where they attribute the “miracles” to this kid and think “what miracles are they attributing to him?”

lol see what I mean? It’s not a super uncommon thing for people to not read the article. I’d say even maybe the majority of commenters don’t.